The whole film is mainly in the form of interviews, and the three bizarre murder cases in the past 30 years around Bob are unfolded one by one. From the beginning, it tells the origin of the film and introduces the protagonist Bob. In chronological order, the main characters involved, as well as relevant personnel, and the materials of the year are listed. , and the current interviews are combined, let the audience use these puzzle pieces to stitch the whole case together, and finally let the audience directly participate in the detection of the murder by breaking the fourth mirror. The whole film is more like watching a live broadcast. After the video, the audience finally finished the video and participated in the live broadcast. The whole movie viewing experience was very good.
The most shocking thing in the whole film is the jury's performance in the third murder case. In that court trial, bob was only a supporting role, and the protagonist was the jury who was an actor and didn't know it himself, and the actor who designed the whole performance. The director team - Bob's lawyer team, the director team invited by Bob for 1.8 million US dollars did give him a corresponding return. I'm a layman and a layman in the United States, but the fact that the jury can play such a big role in a trial is what surprised me the most.
The director troupe began to control the right to speak at the beginning of the scene. First, they ignored the existing facts of murder and dismembered corpses, and created two opposing characters. The murderer was portrayed as a loving, kind, and pitiful creature who was forced to flee from home. , as for the key issue of what is the truth and why did you leave the house, try to avoid talking about it, and use fabricated lies to convince the jury to believe in this character. At this time, the jury who has already devoted himself to the jury officially appeared as an actor, killing with the defendant. The criminals stood aside, and then the director team set up a withdrawn and irritable opponent - the poor dead.
At this time, both the good and the evil are in place, and the "just" scale of American justice has been established. At this time, the supporting role bob will start to add weight to his side. As long as he doesn't say "I killed him on purpose" to overturn the scale, his own scale will be replaced by The kindness and sympathy of the jury are infinitely aggravated. Just like the director team told Bob, you only need to tell the truth but not the whole truth. Killing is the truth, murder is the whole truth, just say the truth about killing. Killed, the jury no longer needs it. At this point in the trial, the plaintiff, the police who testified in court, and the audience in the auditorium... have all understood the scene. At this time, the director team will give the final blow: "May be guilty, Perhaps guilt equals innocence" "Dismemberment after death is not important, the important thing is that murder cannot be proved", the jury who had been addicted to the script designed by the director team finally said the shocking line "innocence".
As the famous lawyer of the lawyer group said, some people were wrongly convicted of murder because of "murder", and some people were found "not guilty" for murder. Is this fair or unfair, but in a society shrouded in capital, some people can buy Mercedes-Benz and others can only buy second-hand cars. . That is, the rules defined by capital, in front of capital, the law, court trials, and lawyers are just puppets operated by capital, performing one drama after another, the media, the audience, and nothing but lamentation and sarcasm can cause any substantive attack.
As elite American lawyers, they undoubtedly know the rules of the United States and Americans. How to direct American plays is their specialty. This makes me think that against the global backdrop of economic contraction and the raging epidemic, the largest director troupe in the United States gives the American people and its allies The new adversary established, but for the United States, the most unfortunate thing is that this adversary is not only dead but also growing day by day.
Looking back, Bob says he told the NYPD he called, he went to a neighbor's house, he felt it didn't matter if it was the truth, just give them an answer and they would accept it and stop bothering him, the result was like New York The police said that there was no murder scene, Bob "called to confirm that his wife was in the apartment", then it was either a homicide or a missing person, I couldn't help feeling cold, one needed the result and the other said the result, ok to close the case. Bob's wife's friend can only say that all the normal procedures are not normal to Bob, what else can I do, I'm used to it. It's not that the procedure is abnormal at all, but that the rules under capital can be changed at will with the wishes of capital.
I hope that China, where I live for the rest of my life, can have fair and just rules, at least not rules that capital and rights can change at will, but rules that are approved by the most basic and pure will of the people.
View more about The Jinx: The Life and Deaths of Robert Durst reviews
