If you want to become a public prosecutor, it is very important to be able to solve the Simpson case. To understand all the mistakes of the prosecution, to come up with methods to solve all the strategies of the defense, to be able to solve the case to a certain extent and convict Simpson is a qualified person. the prosecutor. The powers and responsibilities of the police and the prosecution are unclear, and the prosecution has the authority to order the police, which gives the defense a lot of room to play, and there is suspicion of collusion in law enforcement and selective prosecution. The prosecution was too obsessed with the moral high ground, lost a lot of witness testimony, and finally had to rely on circumstantial evidence, which allowed the defense to have reasonable doubts as long as they questioned circumstantial evidence. The most important thing is the racial atmosphere at the time. Los Angeles has had a bad impact due to a large number of violent law enforcement incidents by black people in the past. The police themselves are tied, and the society, especially the black community, has a strong sense of rebellion. They think that the police framed the black people again. This is the crime of the police themselves. Now the backlash is not the fault of the defense nor the jury. Their systematic racism over-enforcement has made two innocent people their victims. The prosecution did not properly examine its own witnesses. A police detective with such horrific racial discrimination turned out to be the most important witness for the prosecution. The prosecution was derelict and arrogant. How could such a vulnerable witness pass the prep again and again? In addition, the informants call the defense when they have news. The prosecutor's resources are very scarce. First of all, it is famous. At the same time, the Los Angeles judicial department is really unpopular. Moreover, the police were alone when they discovered the evidence, and many procedures were illegal, which in itself was vulnerable, and it deserved to be questioned by the defense. First of all, because the defense is rich, the lawyer team is the best person. This is the biggest advantage. It can't be said that it is disgusting. It can only be said that money can make ghosts. Secondly, he used the most advanced DNA arguments at the time, used the details in the discovery process, constantly battered the prosecution, disrupted the rhythm of the prosecution, and made it exhausted, unable to find its own strategy and rhythm. It is common for defense lawyers to use racial sentiments to incite the emotions of the black community to fabricate stories. As a person, it is understandable to do so, but as a lawyer, it is against professional ethics to disclose the details of the trial to the media first. The defense's duty is to poke holes for the prosecution. The prosecution has so much irrefutable evidence yet allows the suspect to escape. This is the prosecution's dereliction of duty. Having said so much, I still do not sympathize or praise the defense, this is the so-called filthy rich. The prosecution is smart too, with women and black men on the front, but the weakness is overconfidence, and the eight black jurors don't challenge? Not all of them can be completely rational. Moreover, the prosecution only cares about its own strategy, and does not consider dealing with the defense's doubts, which is simply a wrong strategy. The previous court procedure had routine visitation, and the jury went to the scene of the crime to investigate, which was simply too problematic, and it was very suitable for the defense to manipulate and exert influence. The glove incident is too deadly, visuals are always more convincing than facts, the jury saw OJ couldn't wear gloves at the scene, and they would have been shaken even if they thought he was guilty. But this is because Shapiro violated the tamper with the evidence and knew that the gloves could not be worn, so the defense followed the prosecution's request. If they did not know in advance that the gloves could not be worn, they would definitely oppose it desperately. All credit to Shapiro for the violation. It's definitely not right, but he's already done it, and he can only say that the prosecution is unlucky, because the idea is very good, as long as OJ wears the gloves worn by the murderer, it's basically a done deal, and who knows he won't be able to. So why can't you wear it? This pair of gloves was basically believed to be the pair Nichole bought. Maybe she bought it and OJ tried it on, but she never wore it. She wanted to find a pair of gloves to cover up her fingerprints and took this pair that night. Or maybe, as the prosecution said, he deliberately stiffened his fingers to pretend he couldn't put them on. But he knew in advance that he couldn't wear it, so he shouldn't pretend to be so hard. DNA was an emerging technology at the time, and the jurors did not yet understand how it could be considered damaged. In fact, many procedures could not damage DNA even if they were not compliant. The prosecution did not understand this at the time, so they did not refute it. This judge is actually very liberal and neutral, and he clearly showed it in the tape's ruling, so as long as the prosecution proves its facts well, it will be very beneficial, but the opportunity was not seized. The prosecution's closing statement described in detail the killing of Nichole. At this time, OJ cried silently, which was obviously tears of remorse. If this is an innocent person, hearing that the woman he loves was tortured and killed like this, more It is anger and shock, but silent tears can only be said to be guilt and remorse. The fault lies with the prosecution. Justice requires a process. Even if you are on the side of justice, you have to use all means to prove that you are just. Obviously, the prosecution has not exhausted all methods, which is disrespect to the victim. Everyone knows that the murderer is the most disrespectful to the victim, but I would say that such a pity the prosecution has a heavy responsibility. Knowing that the gloves could not be worn, the defense followed the prosecution's request. If they didn't know in advance that the gloves could not be worn, they would definitely oppose it desperately. No matter how you look at it, they are guilty, so everything is attributed to Shapiro's violation. It's definitely not right, but he's already done it, and he can only say that the prosecution is unlucky, because the idea is very good, as long as OJ wears the gloves worn by the murderer, it's basically a done deal, and who knows he won't be able to. So why can't you wear it? This pair of gloves was basically believed to be the pair Nichole bought. Maybe she bought it and OJ tried it on, but she never wore it. She wanted to find a pair of gloves to cover up her fingerprints and took this pair that night. Or maybe, as the prosecution said, he deliberately stiffened his fingers to pretend he couldn't put them on. But he knew in advance that he couldn't wear it, so he shouldn't pretend to be so hard. DNA was an emerging technology at the time, and the jurors did not yet understand how it could be considered damaged. In fact, many procedures could not damage DNA even if they were not compliant. The prosecution did not understand this at the time, so they did not refute it. This judge is actually very liberal and neutral, and he clearly showed it in the tape's ruling, so as long as the prosecution proves its facts well, it will be very beneficial, but the opportunity was not seized. The prosecution's closing statement described in detail the killing of Nichole. At this time, OJ cried silently, which was obviously tears of remorse. If this is an innocent person, hearing that the woman he loves was tortured and killed like this, more It is anger and shock, but silent tears can only be said to be guilt and remorse. The fault lies with the prosecution. Justice requires a process. Even if you are on the side of justice, you have to use all means to prove that you are just. Obviously, the prosecution has not exhausted all methods, which is disrespect to the victim. Everyone knows that the murderer is the most disrespectful to the victim, but I would say that such a pity the prosecution has a heavy responsibility.
View more about American Crime Story reviews
