When all the images remind us of something unrelated. Does it mean that we are getting old. So our life may be nothing but memories. Getting old may not be scary. What's really scary is that when we're old, we realize that maybe all our memories are just bleak. Regardless of audio. Nothing to do with sadness. Nothing to do with happiness. So what I had to start thinking about was what all this was going to be about. Except for the rotten images and some plot settings that can be completely imagined, this movie has no flavor. Grim Reaper is becoming less and less handsome and less depressing, from the dark shadow floating around the room in the first part, to the brutal killing in the second part, but in this movie , but the god of death suddenly became warmer, and actually instructed the person who took the photo to announce everyone's death method to the world in advance. This kind of plot processing is really depressing. In other words, it is just to create an assumption that makes people guess, and the real answer can only be suddenly revealed in the movie. In fact, what we can guess is not the correct answer. In this way, it can shape the tall figure of the god of death or the whimsical magic of the main creator. It's just that in my opinion, this approach seems a bit contrived and boring. Narratively, the techniques used in the first episode are played again, such as the transition from reality to fantasy. But the movie actually played once at the beginning and again at the end. Don't tell me, this is a way of echoing back and forth. In my opinion, this is more like the end of the game. When I watched the first part, I was amazed by this technique, not because it was new, but completed a transition between a dream and reality, at least in my opinion, such a dream or hallucination is very real , I have to admit that I was fooled at the same time, which shows the success of the use of this method. The second film is a continuation of the original film, from the plot to the narrative. This method is not enough to make me feel anything. But the third episode was outrageous, go to TMD's so-called front and back echoes, when I finally saw her heart-breaking scream when the train hit Wendy, and then pushed the camera back into the train box again, I feel Disgusted and tired. The disgust at the creator's irresponsible follow-up and the severe visual fatigue kept me from having much of a favorable impression of this movie. The repeated dreams and sudden awakenings at the beginning may, in my opinion, be regarded as a continuation of a unique technique in the sequel film or something, and the final repetition of the film paints the film. A very ugly period. From the air crash, to the big car accident, to the escape from death in this playground, there has been no breakthrough in the plot. And this series has been filmed here, and it seems to have been repeating all the plots in the first part. disaster. hunch. escape. Then die one by one. The death scene may still be quite imaginative, but the plot outline repeated three times makes me feel a serious aesthetic fatigue. What is life and what is death. Why live, why die. Similar themes are repeated over and over again in a kind of dangling and inexplicable mysteries. To a certain extent, this is an extremely heavy topic in itself, and this kind of repeated speculation without reference to the answer is actually meaningless. Just adding weight. In other words, the first film can still arouse some thinking; in other words, the second film should be an extension and further thinking. Well, when I watched this movie, I was somewhat of a farce. No thought, no clue, no gain. The franchise has always struggled to survive in a very awkward situation. If you blindly continue, you will face a visual fatigue that is no longer fresh; and if you blindly seek innovation and completely abandon the previous movies, it seems to be a bit off topic. Maybe, I can still accept the continuation of the film's plot and technique in the first sequel, but when it comes to the second sequel, I seem to want to see something new, rather than blindly repeating it. It can be said that I was completely fooled by this movie. Or, is it because I watched three films in a row that I felt that way. There is no room for any breakthrough in this series in terms of plot, so each sequel seems to only be refined from the methods and shots of each person's death. This may be the reason why the series has become increasingly brutal and grim and even bloody. The scene in the first movie where Terry gets hit by a speeding bus and smashes the Shiba should be called bloody, but in the sequels that follow, that scene is almost the quietest way to die. The way of death in the sequel is much crueler. Like a ladder going through the head; a standing person being cut into four abruptly, we can see the intestines and internal organs flowing out; or the head being pulled alive from the body by the elevator...etc. But when I came to this movie, when there was nothing to doubt and nothing to innovate in the plot, it seemed that I could only seek breakthroughs in this regard. Doomed to die, and how to die. It's just that this movie doesn't make much of a breakthrough in this regard. All of them die, but this movie has gone further and further down a brutal and extreme wrong path, and those ways of dying seem to have no imagination of the original two movies. He was roasted alive by ultraviolet rays until his body caught fire and died; his head was completely smashed by a hard object; he was hit by a large truck, and the back of his head was cut in half; A dozen or so pieces were pierced through the front face; the flagpole was shot through the body from the chest; half of the whole person was smashed by a falling object, while the other half was intact; To the fullest. It just seems that there seems to be nothing to state beyond the brutality and bloodshed. In other words, in the first film, there is a little warmth in addition to the brutality and blood, but in the latter two films, it seems that there is nothing but death, in addition to brutal, bloody, scary scenes. In this movie, the most subversive of the previous two movies is the god of death, the most mysterious and unpredictable dead child, who suddenly appeared in this movie. Using photos to announce how these people died is a mess. I was thinking, if there was "Reaper" 4, would the Reaper at that time be a team, and then, a few dead kids in black clothes kept pretending to be cool, and they kept using a kind of bizarre in the movie. The superpowers keep killing people. From another perspective, it was originally the perspective of the victim. This time, it will be more fresh to describe it from the perspective of the perpetrators. From a gloomy shadow to invisible, to the photos in this movie, finally, shouldn't it show up? This is a rotten movie: rotten plot, rotten shooting techniques; blindly bloody brutality seems to have nothing worth describing except nausea. Those poor children who are being stared at by death have nothing but dying. And the series seems to be struggling. The plot that looked fresh before was used to rot to death, and then, there seemed to be no other way but to struggle to the death. Life is inherently fragile. But it may seem less alarming to be proclaimed over and over again. After watching these three series of movies in a row, I can finally make a conclusion easily: In fact, the movies in this series are not horror movies. In other words, Hollywood horror movies, besides the bloody blood, is there anything else. At least so far, there have been no Western movies that really thrilled me. Perhaps, there is nothing more than a dying struggle.
View more about Final Destination 3 reviews
