for that fire.

Rosalia 2022-03-22 09:01:49

Regarding the way of expression of the story, the language of the camera and the performance, many people have already analyzed it in place, and non-professionals will not make a difference. I still want to talk about the plot. When I saw the middle part, I still didn't understand why the man was like a walking dead at the beginning. Even if the lover ran away, the spiritual world should not collapse like this. What did he experience? What was the straw that broke the camel's back? According to what the man told later: the man tied the woman by the stove, the woman screamed, the child was crying, the man thought of running away from everything and went to sleep alone, and then the man woke up in the fire, extinguished the fire on his body, and collapsed and ran. There is a point here, that is, when a woman leaves, does she know that there is a fire? The arrangement of the woman being tied to the stove means that there is a possibility that the woman may knock down or destroy the stove in order to escape, causing a fire, and there is also the possibility of deliberately setting it on fire. In both cases, she knew that there was a fire, but without waking up, she had the idea of ​​giving up the man's life. There is also a possibility that she did not know that the fire was on when she left, and the stove accidentally ignited the surrounding after she left. In this case, because she contacted her brother's family later, she must have known about the fire, so she would not be surprised when the man narrated it behind the mirror. If she doesn't know, there should be a "not my fault" to explain. I deliberately replayed the part when the man described the fire, and wanted to see the woman's reaction when she heard this. When the man said the first few sentences, the camera didn't show the woman. He stared straight down, then closed his eyes and shed tears, then turned his head sideways and looked up at the man, his eyes were a little sharp when he looked up, his face was adjusted slightly, his eyes became soothing, and he walked towards the window. After watching it, I felt that the emotions conveyed by the actors were relatively calm, and I began to fall into memory. I felt a little regretful later, and I didn't want to explain the performance. That is to say, there is a high probability that she knew there was a fire when she left. The woman knew about the fire, but she took her son away but didn't call the man. The man thought that the woman treated him like this, and he was so desperate, and it was better to explain why the man became the way he was at the beginning. Judging from the reaction of the man after meeting his brother, He is not mentally ill, but deliberately forgetting things. And the despair brought by that fire may be the last straw. If so, was the man's tears when he finally drove away, because of the reunion, or because of mutual forgiveness for the past? All I know is that one person being nice to another doesn't necessarily mean love. One person is not good to another person, it does not necessarily mean that he does not love. Whether the other party really cares about you as a person wants to get along well with you, or only cares about a certain aspect of you at the moment, your heart will know have a feeling. But the heart will be unreliable. One is that most of the feelings are judged by the appearance of the other party's behavior. The other party's acting skills are good, and the heart is sometimes deceived. The second is that the judgment level of the mind is affected by the experience and values ​​of the world view, and it has not achieved the ability to see the essence through the phenomenon. The third is that it takes time to distinguish, and it takes time to see people's hearts, but many times the two sides have no patience to wait for that time, after all, time has a cost. Fourth, even if the level of self-discipline is sufficient, it has been a long time, and it seems to understand the other party, but the other party has changed, the only constant is the change. The world will go on without anyone, maybe it is a better choice for oneself to give up decisively.

View more about Paris, Texas reviews

Extended Reading
  • Andy 2022-03-21 09:01:55

    The national flag in the binoculars, the door in the palm of the Statue of Liberty, is like an American nostalgia. The color of light and shadow is simply the pinnacle of the pinnacle, and Lalalan is flamboyant and even too restless in comparison. The soundtrack comes next. The script is rather mediocre, with some lines combined with light and shadow eating and a bit of a sunglasses king. Curious about Wenders' creative motivation as a German director. And is interstellar crossing a tribute to this one?

  • Willa 2022-04-24 07:01:06

    The "single words" in front of the "peeping glass" caused by light and dark are used to fill the time gap, and the hysterical scenes are restrained, but they are more and more embarrassing in the imagination. The two ends of the mirror are like prison cells, forbidding the lonely face on the other side. The most heartwarming episode is watching a movie together. The memory of adding a filter is so beautiful, it cannot be denied that it is true. Once triggered, it will be out of control.

Paris, Texas quotes

  • Walt Henderson: Why in hell would you want to buy a vacant lot in Paris, Texas, for Christ sake?

    Travis Henderson: Uh - I forgot.

  • Travis Henderson: I remember now.

    Walt Henderson: What?

    Travis Henderson: Why I bought that land.

    Walt Henderson: Why?

    Travis Henderson: Well, Mama once told me that - that's where she and Daddy first made love.

    Walt Henderson: Oh, in Paris, Texas?

    Travis Henderson: Yeah.

    Walt Henderson: She told you that?

    Travis Henderson: Yeah. So, I figured that that's where I began. I mean, me, Travis Clay Henderson. They named me that. I started out there.