Richard Jewell is a typical conservative, full of justice, and even a bit rigid in the Guardian Order. In a bombing, he became a hero; in a report, he became a suspect. If you want to add a crime, why bother? In order to grab hot spots and publish exclusives, news media people use improper means to steal and leak non-public information. In order to realize their own doubts, they can continue to speculate on others with the greatest malicious intent and release news irresponsibly. In order not to lag behind others, a large number of reporters barked like hyenas smelling blood. When questioning replaces praise, when fabricating replaces truth, what exactly does the noisy voice bring?
The ending is that Richard Jewell ushered in the dawn of justice, the president himself acknowledged his contribution, and the unscrupulous reporter also understood his ignorance (? To be honest, I think the image of this reporter collapsed and the characters turned The repentance is not excessive, and it is in conflict with the previous image of greed and greed, and it has no effect on the plot. In the end, her change is a bit tasteless), the unscrupulous reporter in the prototype was sued, and Richard Jewell also received compensation, the culprit Arrested years later too, so what? What about the overwhelming skepticism and media violence? Should the mastermind be wiped out just because the mastermind is punished? The law does not blame the public. It sounds like it is quite in line with the actual implementation requirements, but is this really correct? Didn't they pierce the heart of the person with the words they wrote? Didn't they get the bonus of criticism? Are human blood buns delicious?
What happened in 1996, why is it not happening today in the 21st century? With the development of the Internet and the explosive growth and transmission of information, while people are connected as a whole, the possible negative effects of information are also increasing exponentially.
The keyboard warriors who wantonly attack others across the screen, the unscrupulous media who irresponsibly snatch hot spots (they don’t even go to the parties and the scene to inspect the site), anxious audiences, everything, the network environment we live in is indeed deteriorating ,why? I think the cost is too low. Spreading rumors, refuting rumors and breaking their legs, but the role that should have played the role of clearing the source is learning how to improve KPIs. For the sake of traffic, the platform just wants to amplify the controversial topic, and does not care about social responsibility at all. Moreover, this kind of governance problem can no longer be simply classified and solved by rough rules. The biggest effect of the rules is just patching, and simple patches can not only fill the holes, but also tighten and deform the clothes. There is still a long way to go in the exploration of wisdom...
I'm still hopeful, but not expecting too much.
View more about Richard Jewell reviews
