There are 7 points. Movies and TV series need people with empathy to understand and feel it. Based on the novel of the same name in 2005, many one or two stars are embarrassing. It seems that devaluing this drama will make you look very good. Taste, it seems that I have superb logic, clear thinking, and there are indeed bugs in the plot. I also agree with what I pointed out with reason and evidence, but there is no need for brainless embarrassment. I prefer to gather here a group of people who communicate rationally about the plot. The good place is good, and the doubtful and unreasonable places are not wrong to scold the screenwriter, but the comment area itself rises to personal attacks, please detour .
I also hate the unreasonable places, but I prefer to think when filling the hole, so the following unreasonable places have their own opinions. If you have different ideas, welcome to exchange.
1. First of all, you need to understand the background. Many people have read novels. The novels in 2005 mean that the novel was written in 2003 or earlier. If this is the background, then part of the plot can be understood. , such as why some people criticize the videotape not uploading to the cloud, what? At that time, it really didn't exist, but there are some doubts that I think are very reasonable. For example, why didn't Emma and the heroine take a look at the life-saving chips, they just locked them in the safe, ok don't look at it, why even the court? The special case department that can be easily suppressed has no way to open this safe? Here, if the screenwriter can give another reasonable explanation (such as a third-party organization with strong credibility that is not controlled by state agencies, or a government agency with a fairly high level of citizens’ privacy rights in Spain, it will be more detailed), but No, I agree with this point, it is not enough details.
2. There is also a lot of controversy, why there is no monitoring in prisons, and the things of that year can not be fully understood after checking the monitoring.
(1) I see a comment from a friend who is as follows: "Many prisons in Spain are currently not monitored, except for most countries in China, which are not covered by full monitoring. In 2019, the Mexican drug lord also escaped from the prison, which is very consistent. Local background, I was robbed on the streets of Spain in 2010 and went to the police without monitoring at all, and JC is too lazy to deal with this kind of thing.” Most of us have no way of verifying this, but if it is true, it is also a rationalized explanation, then we have a problem with Spain. The national atmosphere and national conditions also have a little understanding.
(2) Or the fact that there was no surveillance in Spanish prisons in the early years was a well-known consensus among the Spanish people. If this is the case, it is not friendly enough for us to not understand Spanish prisons.
(3) The second floor where the male protagonist kills in the prison is the blind spot at the entrance of the personal cell. This is actually a shot for the audience to see the layout of the cameras in the prison. Because it is just one shot, many viewers may not pay attention, so the controversy is relatively large, and everyone can look back and confirm.
3.
Come here first, I will write later when I have time, I have something to do temporarily.
View more about The Innocent reviews
