In the scene of buying ice cream, adults see the child's lack of education, deceive the child to see their own intelligence, free delicious ice cream, and eat ice cream. worth treasuring. There are many more such scenarios. We see the "darkness and misery" hidden under the beautiful colors, so we can't bear it, feel resentment and grief. We imagine the misery and misery of everyone in this situation, but seem to deprive them of the right to be happy - but why can't the poor live in a paradise? I would feel that children are very real in expressing themselves because they evoke happy moments in my memory. The circumstances are different, but the joy can be the same. So I don't think the term "paradise" should be simply ascribed to the opposite of dark reality. Because for me, joy and happiness are fair to all. Just because a person is poor or evil does not define him by pain. - I'm talking here, don't "feel" she's in a bad situation - Of course the Federal Office for Children needs to protect children's rights. But the scope of this right is highly debatable. Development and happiness - almost the dilemma presented in the film. Of course I don't read much, so I'll just share my opinion. Of course, a family with better material conditions will be more helpful for the child's future development. Or "for their own good". But after all, it is not a natural cultivation of a native family. How can children obtain emotional needs from a new family? Without material abundance, even a child may live in a terrible family in the eyes of the world. But relationships actually weave a happy web for children (including adults). I don't think emotions should be sacrificed lightly, for any reason. It's a disservice for Hailey to have sex for rent. But she was so happy when she was with the child. ·The little boy who was ordered not to play with his friends by his mother lay sadly on the balcony watching them. ...
View more about The Florida Project reviews
