Looking Back at the Movie The Washington Post

Branson 2022-03-22 09:01:46

"Washington post"

The news media about it can also be regarded as a political movie. The biggest feature of this film is its grasp of the political background and the degree of deletion of the story.

The Washington Post is talking about the Pentagon leaks. The movie only highlights part of the whole event, but there are still fast and slow, climax and rhythm.

I watched the movie last month, and what I remember now is the composure and courage of the heroine. A good movie should be like this, impressing the audience in different ways, and then the impression slowly ferments, with some invisible spirit, more or less affecting the current behavior, sometimes in the A certain moment comes to mind, a certain sentence, a certain scene, a certain character.

View more about The Post reviews

Extended Reading
  • Cortez 2022-04-23 07:02:00

    It was so fast that I couldn't keep up with the subtitles. At the end, I was a little excited. I was fortunate to have stayed in the media for a while. I also saw how colleagues in the current affairs team slapped the table and quarreled with the leaders over the news. The media is an absurd puppet.

  • Josianne 2022-03-24 09:01:49

    Like "Lincoln", the third-rate main melody shot to show his face in the awards season. Compared with "Good Night and Good Luck" and "Focus", I can't see any sense of mission and justice in order to expose the truth. and smug.

The Post quotes

  • Daniel Ellsberg: Someone said this at some point about why we stayed when we knew we were losing. Ten percent was to help the South Vietnamese. Twenty percent was to hold back the Commies. Seventy percent was to avoid the humiliation of an American defeat. Seventy percent of those boys just to avoid being humiliated? That stuck with me.

  • Fritz Beebe: The company's selling how many shares?

    Kay Graham: 1.35 million shares.

    Fritz Beebe: Price range is?

    Kay Graham: Between 24.50 and 27 dollars per share.

    Fritz Beebe: Not exactly a huge difference.

    Kay Graham: For them! But, you know, the bankers always fiddle with the prices. But, for *us*, that's over 3 million dollars and that represents over 5 years salary for 25 good reporters.