The director is very personal, and the whole film is full of confusion, I don't know what it means. Constantly doubting whether my ideological level is too low, I want to keep reading to see the explanation.
The entire editing feels trivial to me, made up of various memory fragments. The discussion runs concurrently with the process. From time to time, the bar flickers on and off, giving me a feeling of "just in time" and erosion.
It feels like a movie similar to "Diary". Today, we organized a discussion about this, and then recalled the situation on the spot. Today, we participated in this event and discussed that event. We also went to dance, and the music was exciting. Oh, there are two other people who fell in love, and they developed further, one became more ill, and the other injected something into the seriously ill person and then got up and touched his arm not long after, and declared dead. I've always wondered if it was euthanasia or murder and security deception, and I waited until the part of the ashes to protest with the mentality that there might be a plot to solve the case.
I'm like a silent, speechless spy lost in time. Like a traveler entering the long river of time and straying into the time period of the AIDS fight. But because it is too trivial, there is some confusion, and with the occasional professional terminology, my understanding is also messy, and it is even different from the content of the explanation. At one time, I focused on the love and love of the two protagonists, but of course, there is nothing to see.
Looking at the commentary, it is said to commemorate the sacrifice of AIDS patients in the struggle of that era, and the current medical success is only possible with their sacrifice.
Although in their situation, it is indeed possible that violence is useful and attracts attention. Only by creating chaos at the upper levels can we attract attention and compromise. They are indeed brave and difficult, but this film is difficult for ordinary people like me to have any feelings. Maybe it was only made for "same" and "AIDS patients" and other minority groups.
The horizontal gap at the knowledge level is most reflected in a section of the movie
"...A little bit more T4" "That's good." "Do you know what this means?" "It means that your condition has improved." [Silence]...[Smoke] "I prefer you to leave."
There are comments that the film is very rational and restrained, and indeed, I agree, it did not cause any emotional fluctuations in my whole process. It's like my emotions have been taken away from me. Watching them fight bravely, I was like an indifferent bystander watching this farce.
"A particularly hot-blooded LGBT film, very French, very brave, very socially valuable, full of individual dignity. Resisting the heavy with joy and enthusiasm, and under the shadow of HIV-positive and AIDS, the dawn that belongs to them is smashed. Mass movement, and an unexpected death at the end. Love and life, both real. A movie that will definitely make your soul tremble, with a 100-point impact."
The reason for this sentence is that my ideological awareness is too low, or I am too cold-blooded, like an emotionless killer. There was no change in expression. [Of course, I was still a little shocked by how big the scale was when the two male protagonists went deeper and masturbated. (I can't understand the meaning, maybe this scene is an emotional expression, right?)] I didn't feel the passion and soul shock. Maybe it makes sense and I don't deserve it.
The audience for this movie is not ordinary people like me.
(I found that after reading the short reviews, I can still understand the beauty of this movie a little bit. Just touch the edges)
View more about BPM (Beats Per Minute) reviews
