Relieved from a shocking aphasia, the film terrifies walking through rows of repetitive cubicles. I originally thought that the "audio-visual violence" discussed in the film would be aimed at the pathological impact of violent films on people (that is, whether there will be a film that can kill people), but I didn't expect it to be directly aimed at the creative motivation and group psychology of violent films. The thesis doesn't seem to be so important. The identification of the two men has become the biggest suspense when watching the movie is self-substituting the heroine. It is also the plot arrangement of this movie as a successful suspense movie. Approaching and identity doubts are hidden lines. Knowing that everything will be revealed in the end, I believe it is an unexpected result, and the last shot of the heroine may be something that I cannot fire even as a man, which is scary. Personal character elements, image elements and the clues of things are interlinked, and there will be some illogical places. This and the previous idea together gave me a feeling of "absence", but the sense of lack is caused by the same structure. Replacing: On the one hand, a simple storyline, albeit with complex character construction and deconstruction; Shooting techniques, practice with crime, connection with society, audience, the last scene is like a mockery, to those ordinary and trivial mud walls, to the mud-walled crowd, they look at everything, condone extremes, and Connecting them with art and beauty, sickness and distortion with the raw desire for beauty and things with raw beauty, we tend to ignore the unpolished truth and worship the monument beyond the rot of flesh.
View more about Thesis reviews
