I watched Abbas' "Where Is My Friend's Home" in class tonight. The teacher said it was a very warm and beautiful film, but I was in a very depressed mood while watching it. How should I say it? , there are four relationships between adults and children, children to adults, adults to adults, and children to children. Only the last one is "warm" in the movie. Maybe West Asia itself has a quality that makes the population dry and distracted? The rhythm of the film was obviously unpleasant, and the director even made it into a semi-documentary film, but I clearly felt that everything was very tense and I didn’t want to watch it, the teacher’s irrefutable orders to the students, the mother’s orders to the son (especially one side) Said to do his homework and let him feed his brother and change diapers), from the students in the classroom to the teacher, to Ahmed to his mother, his grandfather and the adults he met on the way to find Mohammed, the children repeat it over and over again. Their own appeals and their own thoughts are repeatedly ignored by adults. They are talking about their affairs and giving their orders, and they don't care what the children say. The camera follower Abbas, he shuttled between several adults who exchanged business and repeated "Are you Muhammad's father" and "Where is Muhammad's home?" There are only the legs and waists of those adults in the picture. I What I see is a helpless child, a child who is bound by parents and teachers, unable to complete one thing independently without their will, trying to break through this framework to complete his commitment to friends, but even with adults There is no qualification for equal dialogue, and I can only be firmly trapped within their control. This paragraph makes me feel suffocated. The ending is a little bright, but it is not a warm ending at all, it is at most a small shake within the frame, this kind of "lie" may not be worth mentioning on the way from bottom to top, but Among friends of the same age, it is also called warmth. So when I watch this film, the most intuitive feeling is that adults ignore children, and children don’t respect adults, and the communication between adults is full of dejection and tiredness. Only the friendship between children may be sincere, brave and lasting. I opened The Social Contract at dinner today, and Rousseau was the Rousseau who made me kneel in seconds. I just read very little and copied a passage: "Everyone born under slavery is born to be a slave. Yes; it cannot be more certain. The slaves have lost everything under the yoke, even the desire to be freed; The state is the same. So if there is any natural slave, it is only because there has been a violation of the natural slave. Force created The first slaves, their cowardice made them slaves forever. "Actually, it has nothing to do with this movie. Even if some of the viewpoints in "The Social Contract Theory" can match this movie, it is definitely not the second chapter. It just depends on me not having the perseverance to read it in the future. My point of view may be true. It's a little extreme, but I really can't feel the beauty at all, only the discomfort. I don't care about love, drama, or science fiction. Any movie that is biased towards fiction I welcome it to have an abrupt ending, and I also welcome tragedy. But I really don't want to see tragedy in such a realistic film, especially for children.
View more about Where Is the Friend's House? reviews
