About aesthetics: Our country pursues thin and handsome young meat, white and thin female stars. But India's national aesthetic has never been taken away from the powerful men and plump women.
About the plot: The grand and brilliant scenes cannot cover the flaws of the plot. It is said that a young wandering "king" revives the land belonging to his father, but going around is still inseparable from the mythical love. (This mythical romantic love is a celebration of true love, or a naive fantasy.)
It is impossible for two films to portray the stories of the two generations in such nuanced and touching manner. More like a miniature, recreating the bottom and peak moments of two generations. In the absence of other calm narratives, there is not much other ideological gain other than emotional refreshment. Of course, commercial films are all about being cool.
About the details: The stupid loyalty of Mr. Old Servant (forgot his name) is what I dislike the most. Of course, their cultural tradition is that one generation is a slave, one generation is a slave, and someone praises you for your loyalty. But after following the orders of the new king and the queen mother, he killed Baahubali, who he supported. Loyalty that loses dignity or loyalty that loses faith, which is more tragic? This sensational portrayal of Mr. Old Servant's grief did not make me feel too much heartache. Perhaps faith always bows its head in the face of reality.
View more about Baahubali: The Beginning reviews
