With the failure to identify the corpse throwing scene again and again, the fatigue and anxiety of all those present increased. In the wilderness in the dark, the topics that people talk about begin to go from daily to in-depth, and their emotions are out of control and out. Emotions are superimposed again and again, and the prosecutors, doctors, and police officers who seem to have a higher status than others reveal their troubles in the conversation, and also begin to reveal the plight of the whole story.
Just like an apple that fell to the ground, it rolled down the hillside, and sometimes accelerated into a ditch. Sometimes it got stuck, and sometimes it continued to move forward.
Going to the village chief's house in the middle of the night to rest, the village chief's appeal is also interesting. The villages that seem to need funds to overhaul their infrastructure are asking upward for decent funeral homes and repairs to the outer walls of the cemetery. The gap between the perspectives of the village chief and outsiders also indicates the handling of the doctor's autopsy report at the end.
In the story, things are not handled exactly according to the rules and regulations, and people with responsibilities do things in a different way. The part of the rule of man will naturally have parts that are different from the rules and regulations. These discrepancies are human and considerate, but they are also difficult situations. Everyone in the shot shows complexity. Police and prosecutors are bright lines and easy to understand. The rudeness of the police for refusing to smoke a murderer, the contempt of the prosecutor for a woman's death-or-death tone, and the doctor's incomprehension and resistance. When he heard the murderer say thank you softly to him, when he heard that the murderer was the real father of the little boy, he didn't make any obvious movement at that time. When he passed by the kitchen, his eyes fell on the little boy and the woman's shaking shoes, chatting with the chef, and behind every word was his shaking. Even if the story is such a seemingly innocent and noble person.
People in stories often don't express their opinions directly. The doctor used an incomplete autopsy report to express his dissatisfaction with the doctor's lying intentionally by the doctor's assistant spattering blood. Even though a third person was present, the recorder did not express any opinion on the doctor's dereliction of duty, which was also an expression of the predicament. The absence of blood on the doctor's face is also a sign of his malfeasance. It is not only the dissatisfaction of the doctor's assistant, but also the protest of the deceased, and it is also a sign that the doctor cannot escape the predicament.
View more about Once Upon a Time in Anatolia reviews
