The first time I watched it, I thought that the film made in India was really good, but after carefully studying the history of India, and then watching it for the second time, I found that the invaders were the protagonist and the people of his kingdom in the film, but it was the black people who were the Indians. The true aborigines of the subcontinent - the Dravidians. What's up with Brahmanism and Indian castes? ! This movie gives a clue. As foreign invaders, the Indian high-caste people - very white skinned, they come from nomadic tribes from Georgia to the Iranian plateau, over the Hindu Kush Mountains in Afghanistan, through the undefended Khyber Pass, to the fertile Heng River Plain, after all, what the nomads are best at is riding and shooting, and they easily slaughtered and overwhelmed the local aborigines - the Dravidians. After all, these Aryans, like the Manchus entering the customs, ruled the majority by the minority. The aborigines, who can't control the huge number of aborigines without coercion and religious superstition, have found that the rule of caste and Brahmanism really works. The Aborigines, the Dravidians, became untouchables and lower castes, and became obedient to the Aryans (high castes and whites in India).
Now the blacks in India - the aborigines (Dravidians) are still at the bottom of the society, and the Indian high castes made movies of aggression and slaughter of the Dravidians, and the descendants of these aborigines have to pay for tickets to go there. In the cinema, let the Dravidians see how their ancestors were slaughtered by the invading Indian high castes - the Aryans. The Indian high castes portrayed themselves as defenders and the Dravidians as barbaric and brutal the invaders.
Killing people, killing a nation and genocide, and tampering with history are nothing more than that.
View more about Baahubali: The Beginning reviews
