First think about the purpose of the education system to educate students. In my opinion, it is to help students break through their own social class. In this process Students will realize self-worth and social value, thereby promoting the development of individuals, society and civilization. This system mainly includes the content standards of education teaching, the evaluation standards of education achievements, and other accompanying education administrative management standards. So how did this system come into being? The standards for teaching and assessment are obviously quantified standards for fairness, class hours and credit scores, etc. What is the use of this system? Of course, it is connected with the production system, which is the employment system. In such a large system, with a large number of people, how to achieve fair competition and rationally allocate resources, students and schools have to pass a series of examinations and assessment procedures to evaluate, so now students are tired, adults are tired, and the main reason for this system is that there are too many people. It’s not that the system is inherently problematic because of the high competitive pressure, and this film directly negates the evaluation standards of this system, then how to achieve fair competition?
One of the bullshit views: It
is wrong for the education system to reject students. ---It is
undoubtedly uncomfortable to be denied or not accepted . However, there are too many times in life that we need to be examined from the perspective of others and under the social system. This is not only to look at the results of college entrance examinations. From the perspective of students, each examination is a scrutiny of your growth at a stage; To test the skills certificate, your skills must be reviewed; for employment, your comprehensive abilities must be reviewed; for marriage, your character and even your family will be reviewed. Once rejected, the most undesirable thing is not to accept reality, not to accept that we do have limits in all aspects, not to accept that our skills are not as good as people, and often the more accomplished people have higher self-esteem, and the blow after being denied The bigger; the most desirable nature is to accept reality and find a scientific solution.
In the film, the protagonist is rejected by all schools, and he should think about whether he should repeat the course and whether he should continue to receive higher education instead of lying and cheating one after another and fleeing into the paradise created by himself. What disappoints the parents is not the failure of the children themselves. , But whether the child can find a way out by himself in the face of failure (the images of the parents in the film are relatively one-sided and superficial, not very open-minded, and they don’t make much complaints. This is also one of the environmental factors that ironic the child’s failure)
Second:
Self Creative education model can teach students well.
When I was a tutor, I found that only teachers who didn't understand the teaching content and teaching field would say that I would teach what the child wanted to learn (this is also the difference between general college student tutoring and full-time teachers who understand the education assessment system). No matter how old the student is, what the teacher should teach is to first help the student understand himself, especially what he wants to learn (most people don’t know), and then the strengths and weaknesses (for example, first understand the concept of goals/dreams/life. Determine it, and then look at the specific methods.)
In the film, the protagonist asks the students to write down what they want to learn, but teaches each other, saying that it is a good idea to stimulate students' creativity. In fact, students are not aware of existing achievements and cornerstones. I really understand how to create on top of this (creation should at least be based on the old and expand the new part, and whether this process will be too much restricted by the old part depends on the individual's ability rather than the system, the dogma of school education and the The formal part of course will stifle students’ creativity, but if you don’t force you to look at Walden or understand Marxist economics, who will look at it? It’s like the proliferation of democracy will only breed and destroy).
If the protagonist’s concept is not under the banner of free development, at least we should seriously consider what education is all about, what kind of system is, not to mention the procedures, not what students want to give (except like Lan Xiang This kind of technical school compares this method. Most other students don’t know what they want, but the occupational discrimination disease in the United States is not as serious as China’s. This is one of the reasons why this film can promote the idea of this film.)
Third:
Lies and illegality That is, morality and law can be crossed.
The most incomprehensible thing to see behind is that the protagonist breaks the law, lied and had a straight face, begging for the people, like a virgin bitch. His illegal behaviors are based on what he wants, and he pulls his friends into the water. He already advocates selfish desire over the law. If he really talks about friend loyalty, he will go to teach himself or he will pay someone to do it. It is not to put friends in a position where they may be sentenced by the legal system.
The dialogue in court clearly felt that the film’s prejudice against the education system (is it not extreme to reflect the theme? That’s a question of the screenwriter and director). The protagonist who did not go to a truly orthodox university of higher education was obviously right after being rejected. Judges and orthodox universities have preconceived prejudices. Almost falling asleep when going to class also illustrates this point. Before you really understand the nature of the problem, you have written your own arguments (the school is more important than knowledge, let the students have A platform that can provide them with the possibility of being exposed to advanced research issues, the operating rules of society and the world, etc. The protagonist is still talking about the problems and dissatisfaction superficially without knowing it, and has not been able to go deep. Thinking practical problem-solving difficulties and contradictions where)
a few words to summarize:
a year of trial school students do not see life, the end of the film half-heartedly, but in reality to deal with seemingly successful
except after Lanxiang cook, others will What social role does it play?
Those who are qualified to laugh at and question the rule system at least know the world’s turbulent rule system, and often only by going deep into these rule systems can real change be achieved. It is like wanting to change education, at least to be the director of education under the existing education system. (Students look at the problem and the director of education from the student sees the problem naturally is different) Let's talk about the problem again.
The idea is novel, the more developed the value is, the more bizarre the value is, the low score for the wrong value guide
View more about Accepted reviews
