A poor talented talent who fell short of ranks and his family was surrounded by famine, just when there was a famine in his hometown, he fled elsewhere.
After a long journey, I arrived in a small village and found a ruined temple. After entering, he found a goddess, and he prayed to the goddess that if he could reverse her life, he would give her 3 years of life. So the goddess agreed.
The Xiucai woke up and spent 3 days decorating the ruined temple into a yamen, begging the goddess to turn the rats in the temple into a servant, and he became a master of the sky. Afterwards, whenever he met the depressed people in the past, the scholars would take them into the yamen to live and support them. And the support of such a big yamen depends on these poor people in exchange for their Yangshou and goddess.
One day, the real yamen discovered this fake yamen and surrounded it. To annihilate everyone, the talented people came out and said that we are all artists. Although we are not well selected, we are unique. So Master Qingtian asked the talent to show something, and the talent sang.
The end is that the real yamen still demolished this fake yamen. The tree fell and scattered, and the people inside scattered.
In fact, this story is a bit nonsense. It turns out that the merit of a talented person is singing, and how did a talented person fix a yamen by himself and so on.
This story is the Chinese version of "Admission Notice" made up by the original poster for a while. After watching this movie, I think it is a discouraging film for people who are depressed. What if Lao Tzu is not appreciated? You don't appreciate me because you are vulgar. At the end, it is very Hollywood-style to show that a wild lily also has the intention of spring.
The original poster was also a poor student, and the original poster's dream from childhood to adulthood was to learn to be a director. However, the original poster was helpless to find a job, so he had to give up his dream and study accounting. In order to find a job, he had to learn what he didn't love, and was forced to accept this socially deformed value. In fact, the host can be said to be in line with the group that is not "accepted" in the film, but after watching the film, the host did not resonate at all, and was not inspired by it. On the contrary, some felt that the film was misleading. .
It seems that this movie is no different from Meteor Garden. Four people renovated a hospital in a week; a group of gangsters occupied a building that big and did not attract the attention of the police station; so many people entered the school N for a long time and no one made trouble; the hostess instantly gave up wealth because of a dance party In the second generation, the male protagonist who resembles a frog is entrusted. . .
We allow some unreasonable details in the movie, because after all, the movie is fabricated, the script is written by humans, and flaws are inevitable. But you are unrealistic everywhere, and you can't scrutinize it everywhere. It's not right to make a realistic campus drama completely evasive of reality. The director completely filmed his own utopia.
When I first saw the beginning, I thought that they would make mistakes later. They really built a regular campus with the money of those students. Teachers were invited to help everyone realize their unique talents.
As a result, a group of people use their parents’ money to only know how to enjoy themselves. Then Bill Gates didn’t go to college to realize his own value by starting his own business. This group of people was really just for fun, and never thought of realizing their own value. The idea is to spend the tuition fees paid by students on all kinds of fun, TV, game consoles, swimming pools, and bars. . . .
I said, even if you disagree with the malformed values in this world, no matter how unique your talent is, you have to want to discover yourself.
As a result, after recruiting some people who are not recognized by the society, the protagonists did not start to discover the potential of these people, and they still sang songs every night.
I really don’t know what this movie wants to express. It expresses that everyone is brilliant, even poor students? But where is the talent of poor students in the film? Do you want to express that everyone has the right to pursue their dreams? But I didn't see anyone in the film pursuing it. There are only three people who realize the value in the film. One is the classmate chef who can make delicious chocolate cake when I see him pour a bowl of chili powder and salt into it, and the little classmate who can light the car with his thoughts. There is also the black wood carving of African sexual organs that can be machine-polished on yellow wood with a dagger.
The original poster does not intend to be true to a comedy movie deliberately, it is unnecessary. It's not to scold this as a junk film. The original poster just thinks that your comedy is funny. Since you haven't filmed the values, don't put the imposed values at the end to exaggerate the justice. All great men who are not recognized by secular values but can achieve something are the result of people's efforts to develop their own unique values. Gold shines, but you also have to wipe off the silt on your shining spots, right?
A group of people who didn't want to be motivated at all, in the end they expressed the theme that everyone has the right to pursue their dreams. I don't know how the two directors got in touch. Is it to express that although we have the right to pursue our dreams, we are too lazy to pursue it?
I hardly saw any negative comments about this film, and they all said it was very enjoyable. This film satisfies the contempt of the powerful group, and it does look very relieved. But the sad thing is that this is completely unrealistic. . . . It can only be a utopian comedy movie.
View more about Accepted reviews
