I'd call it one of the best "monster movies" I've seen so far this year. Its advantages are not only increased funding, but also more special effects shots. It has a whole story core: from the first part, the father saves the family, into the second part, the children save the family, or save the world. Tracing the origin of the monster from the beginning to the end of the first film, in just a few minutes not only explained the origin of the monster in the whole story, but also deepened the painting of the father's ability to calm down in trouble, the fearlessness of the mother, and the deeper love and harmony between my sister and my father. The "timidity" of the younger brother. As the story progresses, the family finds a friend who used to be their father. Here, a friend has a very important sentence, to the effect that the living person is no longer a human being. This can be a good answer to what the person in the hot comment said about why people at the sea don't go out to seek a safe place. why? You think about it, and replace the monster with the new coronavirus. Why did India almost give up the fight against the new crown? Because there is no hope. Combined with the words of the previous friend, they are no longer human. They may have tried to go anywhere, and ended up with nothing, just a different way to die. So they choose to coexist with the "virus", and even become an accomplice of the "virus": hunting other humans. They can't solve the secrets of radio music, and they probably haven't thought about it, just to live, even if they're not human anymore. But my sister answered it. She had previously portrayed a deeper relationship between her sister and her father, so she wanted to be a savior like her father. She told her brother that because her mother, as a protector, would not agree with her. So she prayed for her brother's encouragement, she was just a child, she longed for courage, but she couldn't be as brave as her father at first. The younger brother showed "cowardice" and even said things like "look at what happened to dad". My sister still chose to go out alone. The mother still acts as a protector, begging friends for help. After that, the friend completed his redemption and made the character more three-dimensional. He couldn't save his family and let the protagonist's call for help ignored, just to live with the thoughts of the child, and finally closed the studio door at the moment when he completed himself. redemption. The elder sister completed the mission at the end, the younger brother raised the tape recorder and bravely walked towards the monster, and picked up the pistol placed by the mother in the close-up shot. In the end, the siblings completed the fatal blow respectively, and the shots echoed each other. In the shocked eyes of their mother and friends, they completed a qualitative leap in their souls. In their eyes, both siblings have the shadow of their father. So it's a very good movie, with very full characters, a tight plot, and great editing, especially when the seaside sister and best friend fight the "inhumans" with their mother to save the younger brother and the baby echo each other; the fatal blow of the ending echoes each other. All addicting. The few questions raised in the hot review saying that you don't need to take your brains to watch the movie are naive and ridiculous. Asked why my sister insisted on getting on the train, why? Did you pay attention? My sister gave a close-up of her feet when she got on the train. They were all injured and bleeding. The stones on both sides of the rails were so clear in the camera. You told me to walk around? Mom went out looking for medicine and oxygen why didn't she tell her brother that he was out of oxygen? Did you notice? First of all, it's not that there is no oxygen, it's just that the dose is not much, and the oxygen is reserved for the baby to cry. In short, some people are still not suitable for watching movies.
View more about A Quiet Place Part II reviews
