From the very beginning, the film shows how awesome H is, with various side-effects, including the second time the robbers saw his face and scare him away, and people in Jianghu called it the ghost of the dark night and so on.
But what are the facts? Is there anything special about H? In the beginning, his child was killed, and everyone else had guns in their hands, so he rushed over with everything. It is understandable to say that he was eager to save his son, but I really don't believe that this is what a gangster boss should look like.
In the follow-up, how good his physique is and how strong his thoughts are, he was seriously injured and could not die. Also acceptable. After all, the key is revenge.
Then let's see how he got his revenge and what he thought at the beginning. Just grab the street gangster nearby, and if you catch it, you will die, but what is the use of his huge forces? It just ruled out the possibility that some punks couldn't do it.
Here H did not attribute the accident to his subordinates, which I am more optimistic about. Then he was angry at the incompetence of his subordinates, and decided to get close to the banknote transport bureau (forgot what it was called, let's call it the banknote transport bureau for now). What did his men do? Fake identities were provided and they were gone.
Not much personal help was arranged, and no information was collected. From here on, H is fighting alone. Can't see the use of his subordinates, such an organization can make people feel scared?
What about after H enters the banknote transport bureau? With a face that others owe him money, no one wants to hang up, I am the most dragged, please, what is your purpose in coming in, is to find a way to find a traitor (he should know there is a traitor, didn't look carefully).
What did he do, pretend he was bad at marksmanship, and it was revealed all at once. Then what he pretended to do before, explained in a critical moment, please, believe it or not, there are a few. As a result, the identity was also suspected.
If you don't communicate with the leader about anything, you are sure that the leader can recognize his identity and trust him very much. Do you let him do whatever he wants? And the leader really did this because he believed that H's purpose was the same as theirs, that H could help them solve criminals, and that H was not interested in money. The money transfer bureau believes that a gang boss who enters and does it with a fake identity is not interested in money, and he has to help them deal with other gangsters.
I believe so because he killed a few gangsters. Can't it be a bitter meat plan? Can't it be black eat black? After recognizing the identity of H's so-called ghost of the night, he can still be indifferent and let him do whatever he wants.
Let's see what H did. He sneaked into the female colleague's house and threatened to listen to her, but she didn't tell her to do anything. Knowing that there is a traitor, but not designing to investigate the traitor, he still trusts everyone so much.
The first time he encountered a money grabber, he rushed to a one-to-six match to catch them off guard. The second time he swaggered in front of the gangster without a gun in his hand, if it wasn't for the viciousness and fear of his reputation, or if the gangster didn't recognize him and shot him directly, what would he do? If he didn't have a sneak attack, he could still do ten without a weapon in his hand? Yes The final decisive battle in itself can be so cowardly, that a threat is not enough to make a move. And I didn't even think about the identity of the traitor. H and his subordinates entered the decisive battle circle without any preparation.
What is the performance of H in the decisive battle? It can be understood by pretending to be cowardly, obedient, and waiting for opportunities. After all, if you don't prepare yourself, you will die. It's just why I dared to be so rigid a few times before. Then the gangsters are also nbs, since they all shot and killed. Why not kill H and other people who have control. Is there a difference between killing one person and killing ten people? At first, they didn't plan to kill, but they all started to kill. If the person who controls H here doesn't do anything, he will use up the first person to look at the big threat that exists, but he doesn't feel that H is a threat, can't he be stunned? It was replaced abruptly. And later, the gangster himself said that when he planned, he realized that the risk was very high, and some people might not survive, so why not control the risk when executing the plan.
What H did, in summary, he killed one or two people, received serious injuries, and killed a dozen colleagues. Secretly threw the phone into the purse.
Doesn't H treat it like a human? Still using them. After freedom, even the traitor did not say a word. His proud marksmanship is nothing in the face of gangster gear.
Can the gangsters come up with a simulation like that, or are they still veterans, do everything, and don't check if the purse is placed when they flee? Isn't that the basics, change cars, toss your phone, check your tracking device.
That is to say, as long as the gangster is so conscious, he opens the wallet and takes a cursory look, and finds that the mobile phone is thrown away, and then he will fly away. H's vengeance will never be avenged.
And is H's revenge really avenged? He finally showed his son's killer to see the autopsy and shot the killer according to the way his son died.
But the murderer is a gang, and other people are more or less killed at the hands of others or cannibalism. A gangster congregating the Virgin to the one who I just want to kill my son. Others don't care.
He can also be so indifferent that he uses his colleagues who have worked together for a few months as a tool, and he will die if he dies. He can also be so arrogant and arrogant that he thinks he is the enemy of ten thousand people, and that he can do everything by himself. He can still be so pretentious that he is the son of destiny. The director of the Money Transit Bureau would trust himself unconditionally, and the gangster would be so foolish as to not check the purse.
I saw someone say that H is a hero, a hero. I don't feel the slightest bit of heroism. In terms of force, the same equipment and the same situation will kill ten people in a head-to-head duel. Intellectually, no intelligence is seen from beginning to end. The self-confidence is quite enough. The top and bottom of the forces are basically trash, and they only contribute to fake identities.
What's left of him? A reputation as a ghost of the night. A reputation for scaring a bunch of people with guns to see him without weapons. But when he met someone who didn't know his name, he was almost killed at the beginning. Intimidated by a traitor. As long as the traitor has a little grudge with him in private, H is long gone.
So the title is the wrath of men, not the wrath of gods, not the wrath of heroes. It is the anger of a stronger ordinary person with a reputation that does not match his strength. The film tells us that we have no brains and are self-righteous.
The anger of such a person, such a person, is useless.
View more about Wrath of Man reviews
