This is really one of the most disgusting movies I've seen this year.
From the beginning, as long as the male protagonist approached her, she acted in panic and yelled like a madman. Even though the male protagonist hadn't done anything, she had already put labels on the male protagonist. To be honest, I already felt in the first act that what the heroine lacks is not an authentic accent and etiquette, but a brain.
In the second act, in order to have a good life in the future, the heroine goes to the hero and asks him to teach her spoken English. For the time being, regardless of the self-righteous behavior of the heroine, from this purpose alone, I absolutely agree that life needs people to manage it. But what happened next to the heroine really confused me. The male protagonist has already explained the consequences to her, but she didn't even think about it. Just because she would eat a lot of chocolate during the training, she inexplicably agreed to the game. In a place where no one forced her, even everyone supported her. in the case of.
Really, from the beginning to the end of this movie, as long as the male protagonist does what the female protagonist does, whether it is Pickering, the maid of the male protagonist's house, or even the male protagonist's mother, he will jump out to report the injustice for the female protagonist. Well, if the male protagonist really did something to the female protagonist, it would be fine, but the problem is that from the beginning, the female protagonist took the initiative and the female protagonist voluntarily. The male protagonist was just a little strict in the teaching process, and the female protagonist began to complain I really doubt from the bottom of my heart, if it wasn't for the protagonist's halo, she would have succeeded in the end.
If it's just here, I can barely accept it. As a result, after the training was successful, the female protagonist broke down because the male protagonist ignored her, and even beat people? ? ? If the front is a problem of the brain, then this is simply a problem of quality. Now let's go back to this issue. I see that many people are scolding the male protagonist for using the female protagonist as his tool. But it was obvious that the female protagonist heard the content of the bet between the male protagonist and Pickering, and she sent it to the male protagonist as a tool, but she had an unreasonable idea during the training process. I hope everyone can make it clear. First, the male protagonist did not take advantage of her. Second, he gave her food and clothing. Third, he gave her knowledge. Fourth, the male protagonist has no obligation to love her. It is not that the female protagonist loves the male protagonist. The male protagonist has made it clear to the female protagonist from the beginning that it is the female protagonist who doesn't take it seriously if she wants to use her to complete a gambling contract. Forcible moral kidnapping is not advisable!
And since there is such a problem in the heroine's psychology, I already feel that she is not a lady. Whether a person is a lady or not has nothing to do with her environment. A person is noble, then even if she lives in poverty, she can do her best to live a noble and dignified life. And everything that the heroine relies on is the hero's, after all, it's just a parasite. Therefore, I really like what the male protagonist said in the back. A real lady must have her own backbone.
In the end, the heroine's halo is too big... In six months, the hero's lifelong pursuit has been changed? This guy is really spineless! ... and the male protagonist doesn't have to describe the male as so noble. Whether a person is dirty or not has nothing to do with his gender.
The plot is generally average and procrastinated, but some of the filming techniques are quite good.
This star should be given to the heroine and her father. In this life, at least she will understand.
View more about My Fair Lady reviews
