The starring role is a British Jew who has never been in Kazakhstan.
The "Kazakhstan" in the film is used to satirize the Americans' stereotypes of post-Soviet or post-socialist countries. Of course, it is not to say that Kazakhstan is really such a country. Nevertheless, audiences including Kazakhstan audiences There are also powers that feel uncomfortable. You can think that the actual effect of this "irony" is to strengthen this stereotype. No problem. In fact, I think so too. I don't think this is an effective way of expression. Just like Zize K’s rhetorical question is the same: "Is Hitler an ironic? "The irony beyond the limit is basically continuing to spread discrimination. Just like the previous report that Giuliani was fooled by the male protagonist in the news:
"The former New York City Mayor added:'I am a fan of some of his films, especially "Borat" because I have been to Kazakhstan. [Using a Borat accent, Guiliani repeated a sentence from the movie Famous quote:]'She is my sister. She is the fourth-ranked prostitute in Kazakhstan. This is so funny.'"
This example suffices to prove that for the American viewers represented by Giuliani who have not reflected on the "mainstream values", the impression of Kazakhstan after watching such movies is really only the "prostitute ranking". "Having been to Kazakhstan" will not change anything. Even on the contrary, only "have been to Kazakhstan" or obtained some glimpses of "Kazakhstan knowledge" through other channels, such as this is a "former communist country", "speaks Russian", "the president is a dictator" and so on. Maybe the "Kazakhstan" who is regarded as the "irony" in this film really sits like this; I really haven't heard of Kazakhstan, it might be better.
However, like the Huangha teenager in the picture, he can say that he supports the Nazis and feels that the Nazis are not excessive enough. This is really awesome (I can conclude that he must be a Kazakh based on his other speeches submitted by station b. Ethics, but in order to hide his personal information, I won’t list them). The "Kazakhstan" in the film is extremely anti-Semitism. This is to satirize the anti-Semitism in the United States. I didn't expect this kind of truthfulness to be confirmed by the Chinese Emperor Ha, who has not yet become a citizen of Kazakhstan! What a hero, he gave this film a solid face: You want to ironic that the third world countries such as Kazakhstan may not be more anti-Semitic than the right wing of the United States. As a result, the young general Huang Ha immediately jumped out: You are nonsense! No one can be more anti-Semitism than me! Even Hitler I don't think he is "excessive" enough! "At first, the mustache should have been a little bit too much!"
Let me just take a map. In national nationalism in China, outside the emperor, the most annoying is Huang Ha, because it is not the first time I have seen this kind of person: jumping and shouting, "I'm guilty, I'm strong. Those who are far away must be punishable" and so on.
Of course, there are definitely the majority of Kazakh friends who are not stunned like the author of the film's high praise.
View more about Borat Subsequent Moviefilm reviews
