1
First of all, a few players must be highly rated. Most are independent thinkers (sadly, the Chinese were out at the beginning), open to new information and opinions. But the question is, what kind of opinions are we accepting? In the end, you will find that the personality of the opinion leader is questionable.
First, in collective decision-making, people are still easy to be led astray by others. In round 1: paper studies, whether white brunette dark, were brought into it. Errors are synchronic. People seem to have accepted a powerful interference and are unwilling to think independently from another direction.
Americans have written a book devoted to the pitfalls of small group decision-making.
Second, human reason often wears colored glasses. Looking back at the whole film, everyone used it in irrational activities far more than rational activities. Black people who advocate cooperation will never be as loud as aggressive white people. In particular, the 40 minutes of the second half were basically spent fighting and extorting confessions through torture. No one addresses the answer itself.
"There's no law in this room but our law,
and the only rules here are our rules."
In fact, isn't that the WeChat Moments we face every day? Our topics are always attracted to those villains who want to brush their presence and attract the attention of others. All the activities in the group are not as attractive as the quarrel between two big guys. Few people think independently, communicate actively, and listen actively.
Third, in a completely closed competitive environment, people will choose extremely cruel ways. This was particularly evident from Mr. White, who made the question of who to save for last, or who else was out, and ended up using a pistol. Indians also chose to torture the woman with glasses to extract a confession, using paper as a weapon and scratching her thigh. When the white man was about to get sick, the Indians were not willing to save him. The inferiority of human beings is fully exposed.
We think about it, a famine or a war will make human nature reflect a strange color.
On the contrary, everyone is keen to use extreme means to get others out, but if the way of communication and cooperation is really adopted, maybe everyone will win. No one thought that the key point of the problem was to communicate with the deaf who seemed to be demented. As long as he can stay until the end, or communicate effectively with him, everyone can submit satisfactory answers. But it turns out that humans just can't communicate. The Milgram experiment also proves that people will obey the opinions of the authorities and take extreme measures against their competitors. People can't communicate. Like a couple quarreling.
It may be just like the final conclusion of the examiner that people will listen to others, which is a very important quality.
View more about Exam reviews
