Whether it is empathy with the characters in the play or with the sharks, film audiences will not like Susan, but from a scientist's point of view, I don't think she has any problems.
The use of genetic engineering to transform shark brains was forced by Party A’s breach of contract and shortened the research time by two months. In order to produce more protein in a short period of time to support project research, it was necessary; it did not kill the abnormal second-generation sharks because It is a precious research material. From its brain, it is possible to directly extract precious fantasy substances that make cells grow again and again for six seconds; the decision not to let the sharks be free should be even more indisputable. Who will do it the day before the success of the project? The results are ruined and you are ruined; and at the last moments of the condemned to go back to find the project materials, please, if this project is really successfully put into research and development, it is definitely a greater research than penicillin, and it is even more difficult to feed back the wealth of mankind. imagination.
The characters in this movie are detailed and realistic enough, and the names are also easy to remember, which adds points. The plot is controversial and discussion, plus points. The rhythm does not look tired, plus points. There is not much humanistic feelings, the world view is also relatively limited, and the brainwashing of too many religious thoughts looks uncomfortable, 4 points.
View more about Deep Blue Sea reviews
