(Contains spoilers, be careful)
In all fairness, although there are logical problems in the first and second parts, the slight ambiguity basically does not affect the viewing of the movie.
But how serious is the logic problem in this one?
It was so serious that I almost gave up watching the movie.
In the middle of the film, at the end of the paragraph in 1666, Phil had discovered the underground palace, saw the altar and the disgusting blood, and the two exits of this underground palace, one was at Goodman's house, and the other was directly below the pulpit of the church. In the end, he escaped by kicking the floor under the church.
The result was good, until he was slandered as a witch and hanged, and he didn't mention it, didn't tell the villagers a word, just quietly cursed Goodman in a low voice.
A god-assist for the three-century-long curse of the town's inhabitants.
This Phil is a witch, this is clearly a diehard fan of Goodman! It is better to die than to expose the secrets of idols, xz fans can't be so loyal.
As for the construction of such a big shopping mall, a cover has been added to the exit of the underground palace, but no one has noticed that there is a huge underground palace underneath. I am too lazy to complain about this setting. I can only comfort myself. So big shopping malls do not lay a foundation.
View more about Fear Street: Part Three - 1666 reviews
