Picture, picture orz// After thinking about it for a long time, I always feel that there is something familiar about this bildungsroman: Isn't this the mode of Pinocchio! The little puppet is not a healthy person, but he improves his personality through the journey; Violet doesn't understand what love and emotion are, and writes letters around to grasp the delicate and complex emotions unique to human beings...//See It's over, here's some repo: Overall, the plot is not very good, the story is very simple, there is no sense of design, but the painting is very beautiful. The idea that attracts me the most is to learn to write letters to construct a cognition of human subtle emotions, so as to obtain and refine human tactful thoughts. I don't know why it suddenly resonated with Roland Barthes's Lover's Whisper hhh, which also provided a cut: Why not let Violet directly learn emotions through oral words? Why is it necessary to form words in order to deepen and ultimately grasp the essence of emotion? The most essential question: Is there a functional difference between the formation of words and the mere spoken language? Is the depth of content conveyed in spoken language necessarily less than in written language? Is this a difference in human physiology? Or is there another reason? Is the written word a refinement of the spoken word? Is this one of the reasons for written language? I feel that I can take the whole linguistics topic 233
btw, this protagonist is a cute girl, the male protagonist exists but is still dead x I love cute girls, babbling=v=
View more about Violet Evergarden reviews
