Intervention of high-dimensional space on low-dimensional space

Cheyenne 2022-03-21 09:01:53

I bought a Netflix membership before and experienced an interactive version of Black Mirror: Bandersnatch . Today I revisited all possible re -enactments, which is a bit scary, especially when the male protagonist is prompted by the computer that someone is controlling it through Netflix When he was with him, it was possible that we were the male protagonist, but suddenly we became gods, and we couldn’t help but wonder if we could be like the male protagonist, and there was a high-dimensional god above us, but we didn’t self-awareness.

Have you had a similar experience? I have been looking for the key for a long time, but the house has been turned upside down and I can't find it. When I come back from a meal, the key is suddenly on the coffee table. Sometimes I look up at the table below, and I clearly remember that it was 11:30 just now, but when I look again, it changes. into 11:25 . There are many similar things, and most of the time we will think: I rely on it, I was too sloppy just now, or think we are hallucinating. When we are thinking, there will be a voice in our minds talking. Sometimes we obviously want to strike up a conversation with a girl, but our inner OS says: Don't do it, it's embarrassing for her to refuse.

So if there is a high-dimensional user looking at us like the epiphany of the male protagonist, then as we discussed in the straight line country and the plane country , the high-dimensional space is the existence that we can't see but can interfere with us. So these suddenly discovered keys, occasionally misplaced clocks, and inner OS, are high-dimensional users giving us a hint? We would think of it as hallucinations or insanity. Just like in the zero-dimensional space, the point is the whole world, any behavior at this point is talking to himself, thinking about all the possibilities, and any interaction between higher dimensions and him, he will think it is an illusion or talking to himself. If he thinks complicated enough, did he create the entire universe in his mind? Imagine that the next monkey can finally knock out Shakespeare's works, given enough time.

The film also discusses the boundaries between reality and dreams. As we discussed in the four-dimensional consciousness space and the meaning of life, the male protagonist and the programming god are also unable to distinguish the boundaries between reality and dreams. The god firmly believes that dreams are higher dimensional, The Inception system of suicide and immortality, the male protagonist is that the world view has just begun to be subverted and is still being transformed. The film has also been saying that if Gao Wei has absolute manipulation of us, then we have no free will, and then there is no need to be responsible for killing people. The fact that anything is irresponsible and meaningless is back to nihilism.

But I thought of myself in Shroom, after trying all the possibilities of the trapped room, I had the idea of ​​walking to the balcony to end the dream. It is exactly the same as Inception, and the great gods in this film seem to have seen through the reality simulation of nothingness and choose to leave the limitation and return to a higher dimension. Well, if this is the case, those people are undoubtedly sober and brave. So why do we have the fear of death? Is it that high-dimensional users don't want each of us to activate suicide mode? Is it for the simulation to go on, they can observe, or can they act? In this way, will the fear of death be indifferent?

View more about Black Mirror: Bandersnatch reviews

Extended Reading
  • August 2022-03-26 09:01:05

    This is one of the few pirated dramas that cannot be watched, and rarely seen interactive movies

  • Sarai 2022-03-29 09:01:03

    Form over content is by no means the future of cinema, nor is it a manifestation of free will.

Black Mirror: Bandersnatch quotes

  • Stefan Butler: I've actually had a bit of breakthrough with the game. I think I'd got bogged down before, but now I can see.

    Dr. Haynes: So you finally finished it?

    Stefan Butler: Finished, delivered, everything. I'd been trying to give the player too much choice. So I just went back and stripped loads out. And now they've only got the illusion of free will, but really, I decide the ending.

    Dr. Haynes: And is it a happy ending?

    Stefan Butler: I think so.

  • Mohan Thakur: There's messages in every game. Like Pac-Man. Do you know what PAC stands for? P-A-C: "program and control." He's Program and Control Man the whole things a metaphor, he thinks he's got free will but really he's trapped in a maze, in a system, all he can do is consume, he's pursued by demons that are probably just in his own head, and even if he does manage to escape by slipping out one side of the maze, what happens? He comes right back in the other side. People think it's a happy game, it's not a happy game, it's a fucking nightmare world and the worst thing is it's real and we live in it. It's all code. If you listen closely, you can hear the numbers. There's a cosmic flowchart that dictates where you can and where you can't go. I've given you the knowledge. I've set you free. Do you understand?