A woman who achieves high positions should not be like that, or should not be like that in my imagination. It's so easy to be talked into by a janitor, so easy to panic, so easy to get nervous, so easy to panic, and want to turn self in after a little trouble. She is indeed smart, she can comprehend other people's intentions, she can be very reasonable to see the ins and outs of things, possible directions, and the best choice for herself at the moment. Anyway, every detail is "seamless". But above this intelligence, there seems to be something missing, a big thing, not just wisdom. A pattern that has been repeatedly proven throughout the ages has been fulfilled here. Although this woman is powerful and high-end, she is still fragile, emotional, and short-sighted.
I seem to be slowly accepting such a pattern. The world is indeed like this. There is a sage in ancient times. It is said that the near is not inferior, and the far is the resentment. Shakespeare said, Frailty, thy name is woman. In the film, laura said that beating boys won 't make you popular.
This film is set in such a way that this woman who doesn't give up her struggle is already very high, but she can't be higher. This deeply hurts her - whether she admits it or not, this woman refuses. Many men, and then 38 is still alone. Although this woman is smart and tough, she is actually always outside the world of this man. She is completely in the dark about being fired. She needs an old man who cleans the trash at the bottom to point it out. Life. And this old man, in the past fifteen years, or in other words, he has only done one thing in his entire life, and that is to love one person—his wife. From the gathering to the separation, there is sadness, pain, anger, hatred, and finally it becomes a kind of attachment. Although these are not stated in the film, but I saw it. This obsession is probably what makes such a humble cleaner, enough to surpass a smart female executive, an experienced investigator, and even the entire huge London diamond, up to this big system of collusion.
Of course, there is another type of men in the film, those bright, big men with money and power. They do control the world, and it is they who define this world is indeed a man's world, but they are hypocritical and greedy. Ruthless, this is probably the necessary quality to take in this world, success or failure, it's just a personal matter, this is how this system works, never give up on letterhead, work harder, you will win laura is never possible win.
However, this is only part of the structure created by this film. Men do control the world, and the other part, not surprisingly, is that men give the world to women. Just like those diamonds, from what kind of blood and tears, how they are polished, how they are circulated in these huge transactions, how much wealth they have earned for so many men, they still have to be worn in the hands of a certain woman, lucky. Unfortunate or unfortunate, it shines its supreme light - that is its final destiny, that is the ultimate meaning of the diamond's existence; the one person who emptied the entire vault, rushed away without blinking an eye. Tons of diamonds, the old man who sent it back to the Heart of Africa as a witness, also gave all 100 million pounds to this woman. If you look at it this way, men are like tools. They need stronger physical strength and farther vision to conquer the world of things, and the ultimate purpose of earning things from the world of things is to give to women. .
At least the film repeats such a structure, albeit not so obviously. Clearly I have intended to fully embrace such a structure. Although there are still complications. Sometimes, some women are also treated as "things", so they will be conquered, so they will encounter another kind of treatment, maybe quantitatively, this has become a more common situation. In the face of such a structure of the world, it seems that many times you have to really deal with it in order to grasp the rhythm of the world a little bit. You don’t need to respect women too much, or care too much about women. They may be divided into two types, or have two modes, or they are in the same state as men, working like you, earning this world, or they are cut back to waiting for men to serve them. In the state of the world, in the former state, she may need respect, recognition, recognition, and even equality; in the latter state, she probably wants something else, but I'm not sure what it is. Of course this is all my guess, I still feel like I don't know what women want. You can only guess from some clues. For example, the diamond that Laura kept until the very end, she said it was her last vanity. The heroine of the whole film has become very thin and sad at this moment. The film does not say whether she has a man or not. It doesn't look like she has. She has a stolen diamond that is unparalleled in the world. She keeps this diamond but It's not because of who sent it, the relevant memories that are precious over time, but just the vanity of owning it because of the rarity of the diamond itself. What is this woman's life, working so hard, spending 100 million pounds over 40 years, and what kind of life does a woman prefer to have compared to the dead wife of the old cleaner?
Of course, human greed is doomed that we want 100 million pounds and also have true love like an old man, or that we can have a lot with 100 million pounds, and it should be easier to get other things we want. This is how the world works. The power of money is second only to God, so we have to establish such "rationality". Of course, it is better to have money than no money. This does not distinguish between men and women, although the purpose of having money may be different. . I don't know how rich men treat women, whether they are more respectful or less respectful, but I guess they should have more confidence. If you just dig deeper, you will still not know what respect means. If it is the same as respect for other men who have achieved fame, then you need to have considerable achievements. If it is because you are a woman, you need something that is still unclear. "Respect for women", then it is easy to fall into the double paradox of logic and reality.
So there should be no equivalent in sex, there is always up and down, first and second, or yin and yang, master and slave. If only from the reality (statistical significance) point of view, women always have second sex, and then it doesn't matter if you expand it, whether it is male or female, whether it is specific to case by case, there is always one party who plays the role of first sex. , while the other party plays a secondary role, even if the two can switch roles immediately, it will not affect this operating mechanism. If the world is divided into sexual divisions, then this is the only way to be interesting and to survive.
I think the root cause of my lack of gender awareness is that I always want to construct a completely equal structure, as if I can use "we" to erase the difference between first and second, so I often get into trouble, stuck in the gap in the world, and can't get rid of it . In fact, there is no good or bad. First or second is just the arrangement of nature. If you want to be first, you must have the mentality and perseverance of an old man to plan and arrange everything and realize it. Of course, what you want to achieve is not necessarily It's the old man. If you want to make a second, just wait for someone to deposit money into your account, because you have to believe that there is something called fate in this world.
View more about Flawless reviews
