"Triumph of the Will"
1. Regarding this film, the best reason for a high score is its real impact, real history, and real records. The more primitive it is, the more precious it is.
2. But I don't know why there are so many yin and yang people. After the yin and yang are over, what else can they do besides disgusting themselves and others.
3. I have always felt that NZ's coming to power is a topic worthy of study, but subject to ideological and political correctness, just like WG, it is directly killed with one blow, and there is almost no room for research.
4. The reason why I think this question is very meaningful is because I asked myself what would I do in the NZ period, in the WG period, but I think about it, I think it is very likely or even 100%. Get into it, not against it. Anyway, I am also a higher education student, not to mention the position of lower education than me, but the problem is that these talents are the vast majority of people. As for those who are more educated than me and have a strong sense of democracy, I can only laugh at it. I hope that you will not be just yin and yang like in the comments now, but will lead us foolish people out of the darkness, but "most of them are scholars", who Know what? The tragedy of WG is vivid in my eyes. Under the power, how can there be no eggs under the nest?
5. After watching this film, I have a deeper understanding today that "the backbone of a democratic society is the middle class". People at the bottom don't care about other classes. No matter who fights for revolution or life, they are better than him anyway, and they are all good for him. They can either eat other people's interests or pull others into the bottom of the bottom. Anyway, they have no more. What to lose, just as "the proletariat loses only the shackles and gains the whole world", well, basically all revolutionary struggles are like this, and people are willing to believe, so it is the easiest to win them over , conquering them is also the easiest, just give tangible benefits. The peasants before the founding of the People's Republic of China, Germany after the First World War, and Russia before October, which is not the bottom to the bottom, rebounded from the bottom, and the power has risen.
6. As for the high-level and top-level people, they are basically capitalists. If they don’t have the mentality of being for themselves, how can they be able to become the high-level wealthy class. But they are generally for their own sake, trying to get all the benefits into their own hands, and who cares about others. So they also need power to speak for them.
7. The only slightly rational middle class is neither rich nor poor, so their political demands are often not so extreme, so they are the mainstay of political stability, and at the same time actively promote democracy for the right to speak.
8. The weakness of the middle class will lead to the collision between the rich and the poor, and finally the rise of the power depends on which side the power speaks for.
9. Regarding 4, it should be added that the gap between the rich and the poor in my country is too great. I have a mentality of hating the rich, and the social mentality of "hating the rich, hating the officials and hating the elite" should be common in China.
10. Well, it should have gotten better in the past few years. In the years around 10, I don't know why everyone was in chaos. In the social blue book I read last night, the public's trust in the government, from the central government to the grassroots, is from high to low, and the trust in the central government is still quite high.
11. Above.
View more about The Triumph of the Will reviews
