In most anti-technical science fiction works, human beings win against machines in the end, relying on "heart" and "infinite possibilities". But will computers have stronger hearts than humans in the future? The power and speed of flesh and blood output can be lost to machines, and the memory and computing power composed of flesh and blood can also be lost to machines. Why can't the "heart" and "possibilities" made of flesh and blood be lost to machines? The infinite possibilities of the heart? This is simply science fiction chicken soup. It's human narcissism. Especially after I experienced this year, I felt that human beings are shameless, including myself. An animal that performs rough calculations. Communication studies used to say that the media is an extension of people, so narcissistic, it is obviously that people are the extension of the media. I think God even created superman—perfect machine—through man. People are the means. But in fact, maybe the robots encased in metal and plastic are our descendants, replacing us humans who can only live in constant temperature, humidity, constant oxygen, etc., stepping out of the cradle and roaming the sky. Humans are just means. I believe this. I'm going back to Transformers again. Transformers were originally created by a group of tentacled five-faced monsters. Transformers are divided into civilian robots and military robots. After serving the five-faced monster, the Transformers Uprising drove the five-faced monster away and became the master of the planet. But civilian and military robots began to contradict, and then civilian robots are Autobots, and military robots are Decepticons. If the five-faced monsters are replaced by humans, this is a very interesting science fiction story, much more advanced than "Planet of the Apes". The story of killing dad and then killing each other. Yesterday I watched "What Happened to Ada" and thought of a similar topic. -Daily chat with friends
View more about Quo Vadis, Aida? reviews
