1. How to maintain attention without a climax?
Rich facial expressions, excellent acting skills, "overlapping" of plots (the two have similar experiences repeatedly), use allowing retirement to penetrate, use attitude changes, and discuss life (this is actually the theme)
The shaking of the camera shows that this is not a "serious" documentary, it pulls in the feeling
Although it is the Vatican, the theme of the film, life and choices are not covered up with gorgeous scenery, cultural relics, etc.
1. What is the communication of the Lord? One is when life chooses marriage or teaching, and the other is when preparing to retire
2. Opinions against each other, one reformist, one conservative
2. Both popes feel guilty for abandoning the people, one is a dictatorship in their youth, one is a correction of their mistakes
3. The two popes persuaded each other. One also saved a lot of people at the time, but later turned to the importance of the poor
The last World Cup music was great
Is it the experience of youth that makes the latecomers pay more attention to the people (especially the poor)?
I feel that Hopkins' performance still has personal characteristics in it.
There aren't many scenes in the movie, so I might leave more spirit in the discussion.
Think about it carefully, is there any important concept update? The movie is still a discussion of life choices in a warm way, but the discussion of life choices is mixed with a lot of teaching-related content, so it is not, there is no conventional movie through the protagonist's low ebb after the outbreak and re-understanding of life.
Maybe this is life, this is life. Vigorous yet silent.
View more about The Two Popes reviews
