Aside from the content, I will try my best to write an immature film review from the technical point of view. Let's take a look at the cross axis first - 10 minutes and 47 seconds off axis, 11 minutes and 4 seconds off axis, 11 minutes and 20 seconds off axis, 23 Minutes and 54 seconds off the axis, 24 minutes off the axis, 48 minutes and 4 seconds off the axis, 48 minutes and 23 seconds off the axis, and 58 minutes and 41 seconds off the axis. When the first off-axis shot appeared, I was shocked, how could Lars von Trier make such a low-level mistake, but when the second, third, and fourth off-axis shots appeared, I thought it was not like this. Simple, it seems that Lars von Trier deliberately crossed the axis, which aroused my interest. I only knew from books that the use of cross-axis lenses to express some kind of instability and chaos, this is the first time I saw someone Used so frequently, Lars von Trier used cross-axis in the dialogue between men and women. The dialogue lens is not only cross-axis, but also large-scale jumping, zooming in, zooming out, and out of focus. These are the same as cross-axis. It is used to convey a certain instability and chaos. Hand-held photography is the signature feature of Lars von Trier. The style of hand-held photography used this time is like a documentary. It does not shake, but it keeps shaking. What impressed me the most is the 17 points. Close-up shots from 8 seconds to 17 seconds shake violently. Let's take another look at the still shots: 11:37 to 12:50 still shots - gradually pulling in - the roots of a potted plant. 17 minutes 40 to 55 seconds still shot - tree. 21min 36sec to 44sec Still Life Shot - Tree. 27 minutes 52 seconds to 28 minutes 20 seconds - footage of the train passing quickly through the woods, the woman's face flashing in the mirror. 47 minutes 10 seconds to 23 seconds - The chick fed by the ants is eaten by the eagle. 50 minutes 12 seconds to 33 seconds - still life shot - woods - gradually changing to woman's hair. Regarding the intention of the tree that appeared - 25 minutes and 44 seconds - the heroine said that the thing she was most afraid of was "the woods". These still life shots appear after each dialogue shot, which is a foreshadowing, but more of it conveys a weird atmosphere. Lars Von Trier's films are inseparable from sex, let's take a look: 1 minute 27 seconds first sex 21 minutes 5 seconds, second sex failed 24 minutes 12 seconds third sex 1 hour 8 minutes 30 seconds fourth sex 1 hour 9 minutes 34 seconds woman naked outdoors ziwei 1 hour 10 minutes 32 seconds fifth sex 1 hour 15 minutes 29 seconds sixth sex 1 hour 16 minutes 27 seconds woman helps man ziwei, ejaculate blood for 1 hour 32 minutes 6 seconds, man helps woman masturbate, Cut out the woman's yin di. ok, let's take a look at the first six minutes, which is my favorite part of the whole movie, slow motion accompanied by the music, one side is the sex of the man and the woman - giving birth, while the child falls from the high building - —Dead, with the washing machine in the middle (in my opinion, it is a hideaway), Lars von Trier used the slow motion to the extreme, and the feeling of time being stretched was brought out vividly. Finally, let's talk about Lars Von Trier. His films have three characteristics - portable photography + sex + religion. I used to watch "Female Addict", but I just watched it with the mentality of watching porn, but it really disgusted me. , and the second half of the discussion of religion in large paragraphs bores me.
View more about Antichrist reviews
