Search Jason's video and found this old film. After watching it, I understood why I didn't notice it back then. It was really mediocre, with almost no action. The detective's reasoning was suspenseful and blunt.
It's okay for Jason to change his style and try a new way, but the story is just too embarrassing.
First, let's talk about the motive of Justice Detective Jason becoming a bank robber. He was temporarily suspended because of a police accident and turned into a bank robber, betraying justice and conscience in an instant? This is too far-fetched, and it really doesn't match Jason's Jagged Detective look from beginning to end. No matter how dashing he was, the final departure was still a thief.
Besides, Jason's operation of stealing money is just to install a virus software on the computer of the bank manager. There is really no need to make things so complicated and exaggerated. Is it okay to give the manager 100 million? He also came up with a set of chaos theory, completely to make up a suspenseful story and make it a little more mysterious. In addition to pretending to be deep, and then bluntly reversed, there is no logic and rationality.
Let’s talk about suspense skills. The ending of a matter becomes suspense because the previous story and logic make people feel that the matter is not over. In this film, Jason was killed, and most people will not have suspense, because most of the film is telling the audience that Jason is a brave and good policeman with love and righteousness. He died heroically. Revenge for him, the ending of the story is actually not against harmony at all. In the end, God turned around and Jason was alive again. This doesn't require IQ, it's just insulting the audience's IQ.
In short, this film can be made into a tough, tough chase, or even a heroic robber, but unfortunately it turned out to be such an embarrassing police robber.
This test of water failed, and Jason continued to return to the image of a tough guy killer, and it was still a fire.
View more about Chaos reviews