This lawyer, who is despised by the industry, finished an ordinary business on an ordinary night and was about to leave the police station in the 21 districts with his rotten feet. He inadvertently saw the Nasir Khan in the iron cage. A second-generation immigrant of Pakistani origin, his humble but stubborn eyes successfully attracted Stone's attention. After leaving the police station for a while, he resolutely turned back, and without knowing the specific reason, he recommended himself to become Nasir's. Defense counsel.
This is the plot of the first episode. The time came to the end of the eighth episode. Because the young main defense lawyer made a low-level mistake, the judge notified the auxiliary lawyer—that is, Stone—to be the defendant's concluding statement one day in advance. For this reason, Stone didn’t sleep well all night. He wrote the manuscript and studied word by word. He was restless in the messy and small room. The restless mood caused skin allergies, so he drank the mysterious Chinese medicine from the far east and was dying. On the edge, I can only go to seek medical treatment. So what was presented to the jury, opposing defenders and judge the next day was a face that seemed to be stitched together with discolored skin.
Stone’s
conclusion is divided into three parts: 1. According to the time schedule and existing evidence, the two parties in the case were convicted of nine counts, but there was no murder, because all the evidence surrounding the murder was not factual evidence. , But only the inference of the public and prosecutors, so this crime should not be convicted;
2. During the entire trial process, the public and prosecutors fixed their eyes on Nasir, trying their best to convict him, but they were right. For the other suspects, it is better to do more than to do less, which is very illegal;
3. Based on the above two points, Stone cited the rights granted to everyone by the Great American Constitution: hiring a lawyer to defend their freedom, accepting a fair and just trial, and high doubts about the presumption of innocence. He particularly emphasized that every American citizen has this right, including everyone on the jury sitting, and Nasir who is undergoing trial.
Compared to the prosecution's lawyer's brutal style of biting through Nasir's memory, Stone's tactics of retreat are very clever. Although he did not turn defeat into victory, his rhetoric about constitutional rights successfully struck a string in the heart of the jury, and that string could play the most resonant harmony. The jury, which had been taken far away by the prosecution's lawyer, was finally awakened by the voice, and chose to rush back, and finally reached a 6-6 tie, that is, no result. The prosecution lawyer gave up asking questions, the case was withdrawn, and Nasir was freed.
Yes, the grievances did not get the snow, the murderer was not caught, but the TV ended like this.
The defendant's chief defense lawyer was fired from the company. Has the 30,000 yuan she promised Stone honored? I don't think so, because he still continues to live a life of embarrassment. Although he felt sorry for the cat, he couldn't raise it because of allergies, so in his poorly-sized house, he was still the only person to accompany him. The prosecutor’s old woman lawyer and the old police detective Box, who were so ashamed of his concluding arguments, have joined forces to start a new business, but Stone can only continue to pick up fast food for 250 yuan, eat simple food, and cheap. The distance between prostitutes and their sons is also inevitably estranged. Life didn't treat him any better because of his outstanding performance. In the final analysis, it was because he was taking a wild road.
He is the character I feel the most in this play, because the actors act so well. When watching "Transformers", I was very disgusted with this actor, because I didn’t like to intersperse the nutritious funny in the fierce fight, but this from the first scene when he appeared in the show, I knew it was Time to put aside this prejudice.
In addition, the actor Nasir also performed very well. From the edge of the small cock at the beginning, he became a muscular man after being imprisoned, his body changed, and his eyes calmed down.
Briefly describe a few reasons why I recommend this play:
1. Calm and solid. In the first episode, the core event was shown before our eyes for two hours before and after. Every episode thereafter has continuously produced side plots on this basis, and jointly promoted the slow development of the main line. The stretch of the plot is the same as the tone of the picture, calm, restrained, and solid. It seems so calm and confident in the pile of American dramas where zombies run around and bullets fly around. I don't want to compete with a hundred flowers, I am so charming.
2. Psychological VR. You will follow the character to experience the sense of oppression when entering prison, and you will feel the solemn and intimidating atmosphere of the court, as if you were mentally experiencing a trial that took place thousands of miles away in VR. In other words, the sense of substitution in the plot is very strong.
3. Only for display, without explanation. This is a bit like Bengal reasoning, that is, we know as many clues as the screenwriter, but we lack the thinking ability of the screenwriter, so he can make up a story that surprises us. However, the screenwriter of this play obviously didn't want to be so commercial, and he stopped abruptly at the final key point. Looking at the information, there are three screenwriters in this play. The representative works are "Schindler's List", the American drama "FireWire" and the American drama "The Royal Lawyer". I think they have their own division of labor, but the drama has a strong humanistic color, mostly Thanks to the screenwriter of "Schindler's List".
In short, this is a great show, suitable for those who have patience and hope to gain something in the process of watching the show. If you like to fight and kill and suspenseful climax of a strong commercial plot, but have no patience for the life-like realistic plot of still water, then don't watch this drama.
WeChat: Wild critics
October 28, 2016
View more about The Night Of reviews
