What is the difference between the Boy Scouts' trust in the male protagonist and the male protagonist's trust in the old congressman, blind and unverified. A bunch of cubs who have not been beaten by society, have free time, have pocket money and minor protection laws should concentrate on brushing data for Bieber and picking up stones on the mountain. Quite the charm of a fight club member.
People can do whatever they can to achieve themselves. Yes, you can use any program loopholes. Bad people can use them, but good people can't use them? The failure of good people is interpreted as the bottom line is not low enough, the means are not cruel enough, this is how much confidence in the rules. It can be attributed to the limitation of the times. After all, "system self-confidence" was established after fifty years.
The Bible is not long enough, and the reading is not enough for 72 hours, which is the main reason why the male protagonist cannot be resurrected as a god to fight back. (big mistake
It is not a drama but a fairy tale to use the bad guy's remorse as a mechanical seance to force the ending.
Modern adaptation: The chaebol controls social media and blocks the male protagonist's social account. The male protagonist's retweet and likes are only limited to the stratosphere, and going out on the street to set fire to a walk will be disgusted by others. Without "bottom-up", "top-down" becomes a performance. In the end, the male protagonist could not pass the revolving door or land safely. While waiting for his followers to reach 18 and have tickets, he concentrated on raising pigeons, hoping that he could run faster than the network cable. If you want to write a love letter to Chuan, please click here ( www.45office.com ).
View more about Mr. Smith Goes to Washington reviews
