I don't think a copy is valuable. When I copy a person and draw her on a canvas, the painting I painted is a subject, and then I copy the painting I painted, and use the painting I painted as a subject. The logic is to say It works, but art is not logic. Copying means imitating, it means that I have to abandon my own ideas and try to conform to the original author. Such re-copying has no originality, and the main body of thought has been greatly reduced. What is the meaning of such a thing? If such a weak meaning is re-used as a meaning, isn't it trapped in a logical circle, then the imaginative nature of art Isn't it gone! Therefore, it is nonsense to talk about the value of art without originality. And the expressions of originality do not overlap.
It's for Juliet itself, not to see her. I really don't know how long it takes to think of watching this movie.
The rest is nothing, as far as the content is concerned, there is nothing to think about about the mess around after marriage. Another point is that men will more or less understand a little bit of women. If they are indifferent, it is not only that men are protecting themselves, but also that they are deeply or shallowly immersed in themselves. Straight men are not divided within a specific range, all living beings are equal.
View more about Certified Copy reviews
