A film of more than three hours and a half record nature, I personally doubt to what extent it reflects the truth, various pieces of information that are indistinguishable from true and false, and the words of a mysterious person who appeared in front of the Lincoln Memorial, almost become the protagonist. The central argument of the indictment in court is simply blasphemy against journalism. Yet, as Ebert puts it, as a film, emotionally, it "beautifully reflects on our anxieties, paranoia, and irritable dissatisfaction. Will exist indefinitely as a faithful record of popular feelings." Just revisited today During the high-level meeting in Alaska between China and the United States, Blinken and Sullivan also mentioned American-style democracy: facing problems openly and transparently, sometimes it is difficult for the public to accept or even resist, but in the end, it is the richness of the common values and sense of identity of all Americans. and boost. In the trial scene, Garrison talked about the people's pursuit of truth and the struggle for personal beliefs, because that is indeed the ideal of all of us. However, in the end, the defendant Clay was released due to insufficient evidence of the plaintiff, and Garrison's complaint declared bankruptcy. I have always believed that democracy is a value, and happiness requires value points. The goal of the government is to measure and connect them, and to use individual ideals as a universal value to measure and regulate a higher-level cluster is ultimately useless for individuals. of. It can only be said that no matter what the truth of JFK is, it is no longer important, we have passed it, and this film reflects the emotional truth, expresses the dark doubts in our hearts, and enriches the understanding of democracy.
View more about JFK reviews
