Personally, I agree more with Freud's point of view. Freud's view must be flawed today. Not only Jung, but also Adler later on, all kicked hard. But Freud was the one who opened up psychoanalysis. Exactly as Jung described it. Freud mined gems, Jung was polished gems. This analogy is apt. Freud was talking about sex, not just sex between men and women. His definition of sexuality as libido (energy) is very general. is very broad. Look at it from a pioneering point of view. Floyd is the trunk, everyone else is the branch. Although the trunk is now riddled with holes. But the core stuff still applies today.
Without psychoanalysis, there would be no surrealism in art. In Western art and philosophy there has always been a linking relationship. Can't be seen separately. It is said that Jung, played by Fa shark, is really handsome and gentle.
Speaking of movies, we'll never be able to make such a biographical movie. Freud and Jung are both masters in my mind, but in the movie, they cheat and have an affair. Or be stubborn and conceited. It's easy to be a female psychologist, but also a patient. But this is a rational truth, and a master is always a person. But the masters we promote are all perfect people. How could they have an affair and engage in "Fifty Shades of Grey"? This is a movie from 2011, ten years have passed. Freud and Jung had differences in character and academics, and did not seek common ground while reserving differences. And the masters we have created (especially the masters of the Republic of China) are all perfect, and there is no such thing at all. Now compare and see, think about it, it is really a nonsense.
View more about A Dangerous Method reviews
