However, I have always believed that as a successful film, logic is very important. Then I have to say something about logic.
First of all, watching the entire movie, what makes me wonder most is how can the murderer get the phone numbers of so many people? Moreover, when speaking, he can choose the most suitable place to observe the victim's every move. On the police side, the prisoner made so many phone calls. From the beginning to the end of the movie, the police only tracked one phone call. It was because the killer was deliberately left in the trunk of the car. This policeman was too incompetent. You know, calling the victim's phone before the murder is the characteristic of this serial killer, so the phone call is a very important clue to solve the case, but the group of policemen in the movie only knows where the dead people are and where they are going. Run, especially the sheriff. At first, I thought he should be pretty good. I looked forward to his performance later. I didn't expect to see him getting frustrated behind. He was finally knocked out by the murderer with a pan (it seems to be true, I didn't see it clearly). Damn, you treat you as a big gray wolf.
Second, the response to a terrorist call. Just imagine, in the scene in the film, if you receive a scary call, how would you react? Of course it depends on the situation, but I think the wisest thing is to call the police immediately. But throughout the whole movie, the one who chose to call the police after receiving a horror call seems to only see the time when the heroine walks to the roof, and other people are not there, not knowing what they are doing, or have they played with the murderer. After talking about the mountains, there is no desire to call the police at all. Are the police so untrusted with you? When there was no homicide at the beginning, you thought it was a prank on the other end of the phone, but no matter what the friend was killed, and you were also named by the murderer, after receiving the call, you still happily not call the police. It’s not seeking your own death. what?
There are a few scenes that I have to mention. The two girls saw the scene where their girlfriend was killed in the opposite building. The phone call was at least more than two minutes. It is reasonable to say that one should receive the call and hold the murderer and the other should be The police were notified right away, but the two women didn’t. Although one of them is that or something, the other should be aware of the need to call the police, but I don’t. I like to drink the murderer to chat, I chat and chat. , Until the woman on the opposite floor was chatting to death. Another weird thing is that in this scene, the murderer has already said that he is in the cabinet, and you are going to open the cabinet door instead of looking for death. Normally, no matter whether it is true or false, you should first block the cabinet door with something. Oh, yes, there is another point. In this paragraph, the murderer was talking on the phone with the two girls on the opposite side until he finally rushed out of the cabinet to kill, and during the period, there should be an angry yelling. It is reasonable to say that the voice of the speech should be It's not light, but I don't know if the soundproofing effect of the wardrobe in the girl's house was so good, or the hearing of the girl's ears was really bad, so I didn't hear it at all.
Another scene is the scene where the female publisher was killed in the underground garage. When the publisher received the threatening call, he sat in the car well. Although he was frightened by the murderer, the door was locked and the murderer was not in the car. It should be safe for the time being. At this time, he should pay attention to valuable items and call the police. Telephone, since the murderer can make a call, it means that the cell phone signal is still available, and it should be able to make the call. However, this female publisher just refuses to stay in the car obediently, she has to get out of the car and run to the stairs, and she doesn't want to think about whether 80% of you would be the murderer waiting for the victim at the safe passage. Alas, there is no logic to kill people.
There is also the section where the black fat policeman was killed. It took at least ten seconds from the time he was stabbed in the head to the end. During the period, the car was out of the car and walked for a few steps, and finally he said it. Sound f**k Bruce Willis, brother, you have time to F**K Bruce Willis, you can’t shout for help, you can shoot in the sky. At least remind others.
Finally, I have to mention that the protagonist's aura of immortality is too powerful. In the whole film, basically the victims were stabbed to death, and many of them were killed by the stab. Except for the ex-boyfriend of the giant 2 female killer, he was shot and headshot after being shot. (Hey, who told you to have such a good-looking girlfriend and dumped others? Not only did you harm yourself but also the people around you, you should be cautious when looking for women!) But, only the protagonist, at least three times if you were stabbed by the murderer. , Unexpectedly survived miraculously, and when the murderer finally came to the ward to kill her, he woke up in time to fight her. That's fine. When everyone thought the murderer was knocked out, the murderer was holding the glass and wanted to give her the last fight. At this time, the protagonist was attacked by the murderer, and he picked up the gun without raising his eyes, and turned her around. It's dead, this protagonist's halo is really not covered.
Well, having said so much, in fact, this is still a good thriller, and it's a bit of a laugh. As a spectator, it should be content.
View more about Scream 4 reviews
