Yes, I'm the one who saw the wrong movie, but there's nothing I can do. It's impossible to watch all the movies. It turns out that there are many versions of the script of manslaughter. Now, even the clothes and the taste of speech are different. The first part was called a contest, and it was not a manslaughter to hide from the sky.
Aside from these, I think this sequel still has a lot of weight. It not only involves female consciousness, domestic violence, institutional reflection, and ancestral human nature discussion, I have to admire and envy it. Since watching the Indian version of the tuner, I have always recognized the scriptwriting ability of Indian films. The film uses a bit of drama within a play to push the story to a climax. Although the first half is a little bit delayed, the second half The rhythm is very tight, the only thing that I don't understand very well is this father. He cleared his name by making friends and making movies. This kind of forward-looking is really far-fetched. I originally expected that the car accident in the movie might be a burden. As a result, I thought too much, it was just an accident. As for the moral part, I don’t think I can fully stand up, because this father is a very smart and conscience image, but not every criminal has a conscience. If there is only intelligence and intelligence, but no conscience, does the story still make sense? So the law is only guaranteeing the interests of most people, and those who exploit loopholes and are above the law, except for a sigh. . .
Because I haven't watched the contest 1, but from the lines of each character, I can also feel that there is still a little difference between the manslaughter and the contest 1. In addition, these scenes and props, I think the manslaughter and concealment is done. Even better, and this one is relatively simple, and there is the image of the actors, but this is not a problem, it is just a visual experience, there is no meaning of discrimination!
View more about Drishyam 2 reviews
