Good guy, the top IP Tom and Jerry was used as a tool by Warner, just to add some money to a bad movie.
If there is no cat and mouse, this film is unimaginable. If there is no real person, this film is as interesting and beautiful as the previous film version of cat and mouse. The combination of the two is still a bad film.
Warner is sure to make a lot of money. They cut the length of a DC movie every day to increase the number of films. The Blu-ray disc is making a director's cut to make money twice. I don't expect Warner to spend nearly 200 million on animals (The Lion King) like Disney. Dollar.
However, learn from Sonic and Pikachu, the CG is still very good, even if the plot is ordinary, it is still interesting.
This cat and mouse, because they like Tom and Jerry, finally got used to this embarrassing live-action CG. As a result, oh, all animals are animations. Since Warner thinks that the live-action CG is a live-action + animation, the buildings and scenery are all Animate it, save money and save in the end.
Let's talk about the plot, it sucks. Terrence ruined the wedding, ruined the guests and destroyed the hotel for selfishness. Warner executives are not trying to smear Warner's position.
Jerry brought the ring back and then Terrence brought the dog in and ruined everything, it was Terrence's fault, if it wasn't for him, not sure if Jerry would have given the ring back to the bride, but at least Not so much damage.
Look, even Tom was hesitant to destroy the cake. Really, he was talking about intrigue for a long time, and he was still a scheming man and woman. Good guy, Terence can go to the palace fight drama.
Originally, Tom and Jerry were too good-looking in the animation, so they should watch two plug-ins for entertainment, but in real life, under the sense of disobedience, there are a lot of bugs, and the gaps in the iron cage are so big that Jerry can't escape casually. Let's go out, do you need to wait for Terrence to try to get in the way, catching mice, white cats are so good, why don't you recommend her, solve problems in minutes, tigers are busy catching cats and not biting people? All the messy bugs are coming.
In the end, the super-killing female virgin bitch was arranged to go online. What's the matter? She stole a resume and admitted all kinds of mistakes. Terrence, a treacherous villain, has nothing to do. Is this the equality of the old beauty?
To be honest, I started watching Tom and Jerry and Chloe. The various looks of Chloe in this film are very good-looking, and she has grown up and has a good figure. I’m almost a fan of her, Tom Jerry Needless to say, it was well shaped, various famous scenes, and finally coexisted peacefully under the guidance of Khloe. How rare, in the iron cage, Tom also protected Jerry.
In fact, before the treacherous villain's alienation scheme, this film was still enjoyable to watch. In the end, I was waiting for an ending with evil and evil, and I ended up with a bad-for-evil ending.
Warner uses real-life CG for false propaganda, and it uses Yetonghui to promote it. Where is Tonghui, this is Yeqingjie, and cats and mice are yyds, so there is no need for Tonghui at all. I believe many people will revisit this classic. IP
To sum up, it's better to re-screen "Tom and Jerry" to make this thing.
A movie with a bad plot and a questionable view. I give one star to Tom and Jerry of yyds, and one star to the beautiful and worthy Chloe, no more!
View more about Tom and Jerry reviews
