multi-map to kill traffic warning
----------
overall four-star, because I like Walt ... …(Appeared! Mentally handicapped fan brain!
This movie is not outstanding in terms of audiovisual, and the editing and soundtrack in some places are inexplicable, such as
13 minutes and 40 seconds in the
above shot, Jack is running away, the bgm rhythm is fast, which renders a tense atmosphere, mobilizes the audience's mood of watching the movie, and generates worries about the fate of the characters (this sentence is excerpted and adapted from "Scientific Class Routines")
The next shot (in fact, there is a short close-up shot of Jack in the middle):
At 13 minutes and 42 seconds, I
cut back to the gun shop where Roland and Walter (not the real body) were, and narrated their conversation. At this time, bgm suddenly disappeared.
Yes, it disappeared. The
viewing experience is extremely poor.
I even suspect that giving Jack a close-up shot is for this. Qieluo Lan's close-range side or will be directly panorama Jack Roland's close-range jump, ah really a textbook-like clip of it (bar reading
then, Roland and Walter dialogue:
13 minutes 45 seconds
At 13 minutes and 47 seconds,
Walter's posture changed suddenly... Later it was explained that the one in the gun shop was not the real body. The first time I looked at it, I was suddenly stunned...
This ball, I saw it at first sight "Wow! Black Thirteen! Is it you? Black Thirteen!!"
——Black Thirteen, in the original work, it is one of the magic balls possessed by Walter. Anywhere, but its power is not controlled. People who pass through may return to the original place or stay there (stroke) (just like the strange version of the Ebon Gate) (drop), as shown in the movie It was the "Phantom" with Watt's power (weakened) that appeared in New York and had a conversation with Roland. The
question was that the black ball was never explained before then? ? ? It just appeared in the center of Walter's ball storage cabinet for two seconds. The average audience didn't know anything? ? ? Just use Roland's "magic" to explain the past? ? ? This narrative? ? ? It's okay? ? ?
There are a few similar places. At first I thought that some of the pictures were cut off. I went to see the wiki and found that this film is really only 95 minutes...
in terms of storytelling... Oh.
For this movie version, I can only comfort myself: "This may be Roland's reincarnation, the last time or the next time, not the original one."
These few words that Walter said made me very suspicious that he remembered the previous reincarnation.
Here I think we can have two explanations: one is the reincarnation of Walt in the thistle plow in doing things, one is the reincarnation of Walt talking about before - the latter is more terrible
on "Walt There is another evidence of "remember":
In the original work, Roland had forgotten what happened in the last reincarnation after passing through the door at the highest level of the tower! Why does Walt say "we all know" here?
Kim seems to have said "This is a brand new story"
(Wikipedia)
If it’s true, then Walter’s "universe will die out" means "this is the last reincarnation"... Damn, I don’t accept that this is the end of the whole series and hope that Jin takes him back...
Then, For me, I can only look at the waist (drop) of Matthew (stroke) and some points that echo the original...
(1) Explain the usefulness in the movie (to give two examples):
Water home delivery number (.
Barely... forget it (too lazy to cut it all
(2) not explained in the movie:
①The wizard's glass ball:
These balls can also be shot for a season of TV series
②True·Final Boss·Blood King:
.................. You don't shoot the Blood King and Hall, what's the matter with him? ? ?
③The rose is the symbol of the tower (one):
There are roses in Jack’s paintings. There was a large field of roses under the dark tower.
But the director only photographed such towers:
"The budget is not enough. We don't have the money to grow a rose field. Let's have a long-term view."
④A little raccoon said:
Roland asked if the animals here could also speak, echoing the small human-talking raccoon otter in the original work.
⑤
This is also the stem of the original,
as well as bullets and aspirin. I can
see that the director carefully set up a lot of small details, wanting the original fans to find some original feelings, but
①
The second
strongest magic change in the film ②The strongest magic change is Roland’s attitude towards the tower...
Other people’s doubts:
Roland's answer:
Roland who does not chase the tower is not a good Roland (great reading) The original sense of fatalism and tragic and heroic are all gone
. Roland in this film: I want to take revenge, and whoever loves to care about the tower is going to care about it (
3) Three magic changes, I don’t think anyone noticed
Walter Padick was his first debut... well, it was his original name when he just came out of Novice Village. The original story says "a name that was fluent when he was a little boy" (draw) (Look how cute he is. jpg) (drop); later he changed to Walter O Dim (there are many other aliases), "Walter Patrick" is a dark history for him,
your name is Walter O ·Dim will do, but this one...has a wonderful sense of shame
④ and
Subtitles...There is only King from where Arthur comes from... It's called Arthur Elder... The original work is Kim Jong Jie...
Screenwriter, you put Arthur in and you didn't even bring Xiao Mo to play it? ? ? Otherwise, what is the significance of King's writing of the name Mordred? ? ? These two are echoes playing father killing? ? ?
(Draw) Actually, I think Roland, as an Archer, shouldn't take Excalibur, it should be Excalibur Vivian (off). After
talking so much, are there any good points about this movie? I mentioned one before, that is, the details that the director tried to add that echoed the original, gave the original fan a subtle sense of familiarity, and made people excited when they saw it, and then it disappeared
when I wrote it here. I took the film and watched it again... (drawing) Can I talk about the part where Walter went to the kitchen to eat something in a private house... "There is no chicken to eat where I came." Wow, it's so cute ( Dementia (I just took another look, he threw the chicken in the pot and left, I feel so sorry for the chicken) (drop)
Alas, this movie hasn't reached the point of being a bad movie, but because its original is The dark tower, there is no contrast, it does not hurt the
director's courage, but the result is still a rush to the street, if I am rich in thirty years, I will shoot an ultra-long dark tower...
(Sleep, sleep, dream Have everything, bye-bye)
View more about The Dark Tower reviews