The role of Miki Maki made me feel uncomfortable, flat and boring and out of reality. Samsung can't have more, such a low role is simply a failure. There will be no pure evil in the world (there is also love between demons), and there will be no pure goodness. The design of the fake human being Miki Makimura has no value except as a stepping stone for the image of a real human being shaped by Miki Kuroda. It is - used to set off the "incompleteness" of Kuroda Miki. It is people who are not perfect. Create tragedy? Miki Maki is neither human nor demon, and is not the protagonist of the tragedy. If you have to destroy such a "beautiful thing" for me, I can only say that it is too blunt and contrived, and it is a pity that you have not torn up a famous painting. Miki Maki gives me the feeling that the word "good" is personified. After all, it's just a word. It can be formed by just thinking about it in my mind, not even a concept. This kind of thing that is limited to the surface is too thin and cold to be unnecessary. pity. I don't even think about how she will end up, not human or demon, what is she? Her life is therefore not important at all, and the role is such a failure.
As I watched it, I kept asking myself, what can absolute pure kindness represent? What is the purpose of this role? It or she didn't attract me, and I don't know why I was attracted by it. It is clear that human nature is not necessarily good, and what human beings pursue is not necessarily good. Goodness may only be a sufficient and unnecessary condition to distinguish man from evil. This concept seems to me very empty, very illusory. Even if it can be shown, it cannot be proved by Miki Maki's behavior. In my opinion, Masaaki Yuasa only touched the corners of "goodness", and used some face masks without [reflection] to fool me.
On the contrary, I was only worried about one person from the beginning to the end of the whole play, and that was Miko and Kuroda Miki. Kuroda Miki has a kindness that people can empathize with. She has a self-interested side and suffers deeply for her own situation. If Miki Makimura is stupid and transparent (what Yuasa wants to show), Miki Kuroda is not transparent at first, but later becomes transparent because of kindness , isn't this the normal development process of human self-consciousness? She has the shortcomings that everyone has, and has a beautiful and moving side of human nature. Even if she has no similar experience with her, she can feel deeply resentful for her. She is such a good person who likes beautiful things (Makimura Mei tree), honest and sincere, able to give his life for love. I like her, and I say she's the real heroine Miki because the character is complete, flesh and blood, the closest thing to a real "person", and that alone is enough to resonate with others. Kuroda Miki's appeal to the audience is only logical, and it is something that the author can justify. But the author chose to spend a lot of space on Maki Maki, and it is hard not to suspect that he did so on purpose. Miki Makimura, who wrote "I'm kind" all over his body, did not change at all from the beginning to the end, and showed all kinds of kindness in his actions. And Miki Kuroda, who has made breakthroughs and changed, who needs to be understood with heart to discover his kindness and humanity. After all, the light of human beings must be human, and there can be no insurmountable or estrangement or gulf between human beings. No one can be like Miki Makimura, and no one can truly achieve the truth, but the beauty of Miki Kuroda is for each of us. Classes are empathically understood and within reach. Everyone can be Kuroda Miki, this is the resolution of contradictions.
Of course, not to mention that I didn't see Yuasa's clear thinking on the setting of supporting roles at all. Goodness is a concept that has been chewed up by superficial creators. Because the author's understanding of the relationship between the truth, the good and the United States is not enough.
View more about Devilman: Crybaby reviews
