As the saying goes, in an avalanche, no snowflake is innocent. Militarism coerces the whole people into the war. Many people are coerced and brainwashed. forced. But if you help make cannonballs, are you innocent? While the film shouldn't be slapped with hats, it's anti-war at its core. But there are still many, many cores of militarism, hidden in the details.
The heroine's attribution of defeat in the film is not succumbing to violence. rather than defeating justice. This is the civilian perspective and point of view of the director and the heroine. But everything has to be reasonable. Since the late Qing Dynasty, no one has come to your house to beat you? right? You fight everywhere. Shouldn't this result be correct? Do not succumb to incendiary and nuclear bombs. But when the U.S. military came, there were no guerrillas and no street fighting. This is also the contradiction of the Japanese. The whole people were supposed to be broken, but as soon as the broadcast announced their surrender, the whole people immediately became obedient again.
To start a war, the common people help make fighter engines, and these obedient people are not so innocent. Why not run, why not make a revolution. Why not passively resist. In the end, it was not wrong to be nuclear bombed. The nuclear bomb hit civilians, not the military, not the arsenal. Ordinary people in the city. But not so explosive, but also to launch national resistance. So what do you say?
View more about In This Corner of the World reviews
