Is "Space Cleaner" better or "Victory" better? Victory: Space Cleaner, of course.
When some people are emphasizing that the plot of "Victory" or the sci-fi setting is not rigorous (hard scientist), some people are saying that the emergency broadcast segment imitates "The Wandering Earth" (Master of Sinology), some people say that this is "Boundless Space" ”, “The Orville”, “Guardians of the Galaxy” and a hodgepodge of Korean genre films (reading machines), the director generously admitted that he borrowed from the Japanese super hard sci-fi anime “Space Cleaner” and a lot of Other cinematic and anime concepts helped South Korea cross the starting line of the world's sci-fi movies.
This article will not discuss elements such as movie concept setting, plot writing, and art design. It only starts from one point. I hope that all moviegoers who have a little pursuit (in Police Officer Tan's words, "film and television participants") can get The best treat for a filmmaker, that is:
Filmmakers have the most basic respect for the audience's IQ.
This experience, I believe everyone is the best when reading "Science Fiction World". In "Science Fiction World", the most obvious difference between mature writers and amateur writers is that amateur writers spend a lot of pen and ink to introduce the background of the story, the design concept and the working principle. Just as when "Interstellar" introduced Murphy's Law, it would not introduce it to the audience with such straightforward words as what Murphy's Law is, but would use the different views between father and daughter on the same law, which seems very natural. Clarify definitions in conflict of opinion. But people are generally tolerant of amateur writers, because everyone knows that they are college students, high school students or even junior high school students.
What was the worst thing to do in Victory? Of course it is repeated over and over again: if the factory falls, the earth is lost. In other places, the movie defaults that our audience and the people in the movie are people of the same period, and can roughly understand some of their behaviors. As the plot progresses and the pictures are displayed, it is gradually broken down that some seem to need explanation, but in reality. The settings in other movies and TV series have been played badly.
So how do you see that some directors insult the audience's IQ? I'll do a show:
In 2xxx years, due to the continuous destruction of the environment by human beings, the earth's environment has continued to deteriorate, and it is necessary to wear a filter mask to live on earth. And UTS has built a habitable space station that only the wealthy can afford, accessible via a space elevator that requires a ticket. With the continuous increase of space junk generated by construction, there are space junk guys who make a living by picking up garbage. Our story starts when the junk guys pick up a broken ship.
In fact, it is very common for filmmakers to misposition the audience in some countries or regions, just as there are always people who are unwilling to get vaccinated. However, when compulsory education tells us that as modern people, we must have basic scientific literacy, science workers are still emphasizing the working principle of vaccines and their non-toxicity over and over again; law enforcement agencies are still emphasizing with pharmaceutical manufacturers that vaccine production must comply with GMP, you can no longer produce vaccines that let people die and maim. This is an insult to the IQ of ordinary people.
The filmmakers of "Victory" didn't explain to us why cosmic crap, the gender division of robots, how to communicate without speaking a language, how to shoot down missiles, and how swarms work for nanobots, because the producers defaulted to the audience for their films , is a [movie watcher], not a mentally retarded.
At the same time, every country or region has a self-media that uses the skills necessary for the first grade of elementary school to read pictures, write words, and re-introduce them. Their audience is the one who creates box office miracles or word-of-mouth myths.
Good or bad, every moviegoer has different criteria for judging it, but bad and not bad, the key players think that the producers know best in their hearts.
Just like writing a thesis, the author will not write a long dissertation when he thinks of an idea, showing that he has invented the binary linear equation, but will first understand whether his ideas have been implemented in practice by predecessors. Directors and screenwriters will not start writing scripts without watching ten films of the same type before making a movie (named and praised the production team of "Love Apartment", the number of films read far exceeded expectations), even if they do not watch, one has an actor Performers with basic cultivation will definitely refer to the performance methods of performers of the same type of film.
So whether "Victory" looks good or not depends entirely on whether people have noticed that Koreans have played the traditional [Earth-type film] to the fullest, and they have left the atmosphere and played it beautifully again. At the same time, the gender opposition When the conflict intensified, the little girl actor used was still so pure and lovely, and integrated ethnic diversity so naturally that when people were spraying this movie, no one cared that the Chinese trash guy was better than "Green Arrow". "The plastic mandarin who is only slightly better.
View more about Space Sweepers reviews
