1 I have watched it many times, and I just watched 2 for the first time today. When I watched 1, I liked it very much, so I didn't think too much about it. After watching 2, I realized that the 2 films were not really shot from a more serious and documentary perspective, but more expressed the various problems faced by female politicians. What stands out is the female angle and feeling, but it's fine and still looks good. Compared with the first part, what I feel more is the queen's insistence on the original intention, which is also for the country, but more because she chose to stay unmarried for life and fully dedicate herself to the country in order to adhere to her original intention. She saw more of her human nature, for example, Mary Stewart should be sentenced to death for treason according to the law, but she was unwilling and was very confused, whether it was because she still had awe for Roman Catholicism, or sympathy for Mary, who was also the queen. In the movie, she said that a queen has no right (or can't? I forgot) to execute another queen, and there is nothing wrong with cherishing each other, but this kind of kindness that endangers her own throne and life is really unnecessary. With her perseverance, I Preferring to believe the real Elizabeth was more of a religious concern, because at the time neither the Queen nor Worthingham had expected that the execution of Mary would lead to an uprising from Spain.
Regarding the relationship with Sir Lawley and the entanglement between the maid Beth, although I have seen many film critics criticize the triangular relationship for too much description of the film's focus, I also know that the historical facts and the film are quite different, but the interpretation of the big devil is very big. The queen is also a woman, and also longs to be loved and cared for. Of course, there are physical needs, but I think it shows more that I insist on holding on by myself, and the inside is exhausted, but the outside can't show it It's useless to come out. Except for the courtiers, there is no one around her who can give her two-way emotional communication. Lawley appears. First of all, the Queen is interested in him. Lawley is more respectful to the Queen, love and serve, (but also very Not bad, I can really serve), but I gave tenderness and care to the weaker and more dedicated (?) Beth. The queen feels the sense of betrayal as a woman, and the performance of the big devil can arouse empathy, but soon the queen Just cheer up, her country and people still need her protection, and Sir Lawley also expressed his love for the Queen by leading the fire ship to charge the Spanish fleet, thinking that this is the best exchange of feelings between him and the Queen. (Although it seems that the two of them have actually slept?), how to say this paragraph is quite sublime.
On the whole, do you think that the core emotional aspect of 2 is more able to arouse the empathy of modern women? Male audiences may not feel it. Modern women, especially those with strong personalities, have dual pressures in work and life, and no one can talk to them, and no one can help them. There will be results. Men are generally with more gentle and considerate girls, but modern women are good, but they are only a little bit emotional, and they are very happy even if they don't talk about it.
View more about Elizabeth: The Golden Age reviews
