First of all, I recommend the concurrent program of "Villain Film Review". It's more comprehensive. The topic of black power and justice and procedural justice is a never-ending topic.
The 5-episode film fully presents a director's own attitude, which is what a master does. In short, a despicable villain killed someone, but because the Los Angeles police have been engaging in racial discrimination and violent law enforcement, causing public outrage. As a result, he was slapped in the face, and the murderer was found not guilty. But in fact, the entire case and the presentation of this American judicial ecology are the part of the iceberg under the sea.
First of all, let’s talk about the question of whether there is no or no crime. According to the presentation of the film, Simpson may itself be a selfish despicable villain. Domestic madman. But even if he is usually extremely hypocritical, he does all kinds of evil in private. You can't just rely on these points to determine that he should be a murderer. Even if the motive for murder is sufficient, it cannot be said that someone killed someone. Another policeman did sneak into someone's house through the wall to collect evidence. This seriously involves the issue of procedural justice. No matter how righteous and rhetorical the police are in the documentary, these people did sneak in. So what's your motive for sneaking in? Are you really kind enough to remind him, to report the letter? He also said to the camera that he was fair, but he was only laughing at his generosity. That is, if you do a lot of injustice, you will kill yourself, and if you do too much dirty work, the wolf really comes, and it will immediately bring retribution. Like the old lady on the jury said, even if he really killed him, he should be voted innocent to avenge the injustice before the public power. The Prosecutor is really the mother of the earth - that's it.
Coupled with the lack of evidence in the case itself, all is circumstantial evidence. If it was a homicide, how to explain the disappearance of blood samples, the gloves can't be brought in? It takes two murderers to kill two people. If you kill one, won't the other run very far? None of this can be explained. If it is said to be a hired murderer, it is even more necessary to produce evidence. The result of this innocence is the retribution for the public prosecutor who has been unjust in the judicial process. And it is revenge from the people. Simpson is just the individual involved. Another point is about money. If you don't have the money to hire a good lawyer, it's really useless. These legal bigwigs at the time were making $50,000 a day. If it weren't for Simpson, I'm afraid they would have been pressed to death. At the end, Simpson was brainless again, and finally was crushed. The result was a result, and everyone didn't end well.
View more about O.J.: Made in America reviews
