In view of the director's consistent style.
If you regard the role of father as a government...
Then Martin died on the operating table's father,
It was a thunder planted by the government's improper operations (or mistakes) that year,
Although my father circled this thunder cautiously,
But the law will not let him go.
The law means that there is a cause, there must be an effect,
It means that as long as you enter the physical form of a certain human group (such as the operation of the state machine),
Some mistakes will inevitably occur, and the consequences of such mistakes will inevitably occur.
It is not changed by people's subjective will-the emergence of consequences is only a matter of time.
Martin does not represent Satan, nor does he represent the devil. He represents "law" in this film.
When Martin told his father that the consequences came,
You must choose a sacrifice among your son, daughter, wife,
In order to save others.
Father thought it would be okay to ignore Martin,
Later he thought that if Martin was killed, everyone would be fine.
Martin said: You should know that if you kill me, you will only lose the whole family. Don't be stupid.
The law is the law, and the consequences of the faults caused by the father will surely occur.
It’s ignoring the law and letting the whole family (country) go to the grave,
Or sacrifice one of them.
The film sets the role of father to never die.
One son, daughter, and wife must die, otherwise they all die.
Father is the "culprit", why didn't he die?
Because of course the government...the government cannot (will) die, and the mistakes made by the government...of course are paid for by other groups (classes).
Although the wife also belongs to the parent’s floor,
She is just a role to cooperate with her father's existence,
She helped her father manage the house and looked after the children,
But she is not the speaker of the family, she is not the head of the family,
She likes her son who is innocent and ignorant,
I don’t really like my daughter who has a lot of scheming, and pours wherever the wind blows.
She was originally full of justice, did not believe in evil, and did not bow to her father.
Later she found that Martin (the law) was right,
If you don’t sacrifice one, everyone (including herself) will die.
In the face of the desire to survive, she chose to bow her head,
Even do my father's ideological work: we are still young and can have a new life. It's better than everyone is gone.
The daughter begged her parents to die: let me die, sacrifice me to save everyone, father, I can die for you, I think you are honored to die.
She forced her parents in this way.
In a blink of an eye, he ran to the place where Martin was imprisoned to negotiate terms: Let me live, and I will let you go.
In the end, the father chose to tie his son, daughter and wife in three directions, blindfolded and shot in circles.
Whoever hits it is fate.
This setting is very interesting, and it must be the most innocent and simplest son who has obviously sacrificed.
Why do you want to set it up like this? It seems that father (government... government) is helpless?
Why not take a lottery? Whoever wins is unlucky, that’s even more fair,
It seems that I chose it myself, and I can't blame others.
Explain that the initiative is still in the hands of the father,
Explain that the one that should be sacrificed will definitely be sacrificed,
It must be done by the father.
The law is the law.
When I talk nonsense.
View more about The Killing of a Sacred Deer reviews
