Dedication, operation, entertainment

Neil 2022-03-23 09:02:25

The background of the new American film "Mank" is Hollywood in the 1930s and 1940s. The protagonist Mank is a genius screenwriter. He is funny and cute. He is highly valued by several major studios and powers. He was ostracized by the entire Hollywood because of his drunken rants. Unwilling to be lonely, Manke wrote the script of "The Great Citizen" by himself. The movie used this script as the basic clue and told his past events in Hollywood in flashbacks. This is a black and white film, and I always feel that this kind of film is more difficult to shoot than a color film, and requires more lighting and photography. There are a lot of Hollywood-themed movies, with different eras and different perspectives. Taken together, you can understand and grasp the basic situation of the most interesting industry in the world. Such production and quality, leading the world's trend, and touching the hearts of the world, first of all, we must praise their professionalism, which should be the cornerstone of Hollywood's prosperity. In addition, the money power and political operation behind it cannot be separated. Due to the interaction between Hollywood and its sponsors and politics, of course, there are clear political positions and values. From the anti-Nazi and anti-GS in the movie, to the current anti-racism, giving enough sympathy to homosexuality, etc., we must stand in line. In a highly free and developed commodity society, everything needs to be operated and everything is entertained, even the presidential election, and Hollywood is of course no exception. There are too many people who can write scripts. They come to you to write because you can bring more fun to the circle; everyone keeps playing with you, not because you are cute or because of your patience, but because everyone wants to watch it See how it ends. From a long-term perspective, Hollywood's back waves follow the front waves, never resting, metabolism, and never ending. Westerners usually can’t stand excessive restraint, just like the protagonist of a movie, when the situation is smooth, people can live easily and happily, and they can speak without thinking and do whatever they want, so Hollywood is also a place rich in gossip, which also increases. entertainment of the industry. The main background of "Mank" is Hollywood in the 1930s, Europe was generally turbulent, and various trends of thought and ideology were rising, and Hollywood was in the transition period from silent films to sound films. Others were fighting to get rid of the crisis and clamoring for social revolution. Hollywood people are still singing and dancing, drunk and dreaming. The United States maintained isolationism in the world at that time, and Hollywood entertainers could live a more leisurely life, but they could not break the rules. The male protagonist of the movie is not welcomed by everyone because he has social ideals and wrong political stance, and because he finally tore up all kinds of disguises in the industry and revealed the truth.

View more about Mank reviews

Extended Reading
  • Maximo 2022-04-21 09:02:46

    Together with "Creed" and "Once Upon a Time in Hollywood", it is a life-changing trilogy - and they all require the audience to absorb information through their own self-organization, which can be said to be very "ugly" movies. The look and feel of "Mank" actually coincides with the previous David Fincher's "Mind Hunter", which is the exploration of some meta-rules on the eve of a new order... There are discussions in similar directions in it . Off topic, the scene of the most primitive movie in "Creed" I saw in the car master's broadcast before (a film-controlled obsession), the pincer movement lined up through the gate: the gear of the camera/camera/projector turns the goalkeeper A character is mapped from the present to the past... Isn't it the same with the frequent flashbacks of "Mank"? So, if you think of the pincer movement as a materialized flashback, it's not wrong, then the "director's movie love letter" bean example has one more work.

  • Carol 2022-03-25 09:01:12

    Once Upon a Time... in Classical Hollywood. It weakened the hostile attitude towards Orson Welles in the original script of Finch's father, but still achieved the purpose of "rectifying" Mankiewicz's name, but in fact about "How the "Citizen Kane" script was born and the issue of credit distribution" does not seem to be the biggest fun and key to watching this movie (the dispute between the two about authorship only accounts for a small part), but it is about Mankiewy. Qi's daily interactions with friends, family, work partners, and industry tycoons embed the maverick and unruly side of his character with the "good" tradition of Hollywood Vanity Fair's intrigue and interest-oriented traditions, allowing this genius who is also a genius. Li and the arrogant character of the literati exudes personality charm every second, and the interspersed teasing and irony of the industry can also make people happy. The dialogues of the three receptions are edited concisely and vigorously. Don Quixote refers to Sang and scolded Huai, which can be called the whole film. optimal. In addition, this film can be watched in conjunction with "Trumbo", and the two world-renowned screenwriters will take you on a string of most of the classic Hollywood.

Mank quotes

  • [a drunken Herman Mankiewicz sits at the corner of a large dinner table at an elaborate costume party, hosted by William Randolph Hearst and Louis B. Mayer. Instead of tinking on a glass to get the guests' attention, he slashes his glass with a knife. Gasps fill the room as he rises from his seat]

    Herman Mankiewicz: I've got a great idea for a picture, Louis. A picture I just know you're gonna love. It's a modern day version of Quixote!

    [Mank realizes his voice echoes through the room, but he continues, circling the table full of silent guests]

    Herman Mankiewicz: Now I know none of you read, but you know what it's about. A deluded old nobleman, who tilts at windmills. So how might we update this story?

    Butler: [whispers to Hearst] Do you want me to get someone?

    William Randolph Hearst: No.

    Herman Mankiewicz: How about we make our Quixote... a newspaperman? Who else could make a living tilting at windmills? But that's not enough... no, he wants more than readership. He wants more than adulation, he wants love. So, he runs for public office, and because he's notably rich, he wins... no, w-w-w-wait a minute. Notably rich and powerful, can't win over an audience unless notably rich and powerful sees the error of his ways in the final reel. Notably rich and powerful and making no goddamn excuses for it is only admirable in real life. Isn't that right, Louis?

    [Mayer glares at Mank as he drunkenly attempts to light his cigarette with the massive fireplace at the end of the room, unsuccessfully. Marion Davies takes a swig of her drink]

    Herman Mankiewicz: So what do we do? Anybody? We give him ideals! Ideals that any dirt-poor, depression-weary audience can identify with. Our Quixote is against crooked trusts, he's for the eight-hour workday, fair income tax, better schools. Why, he's even for government ownership of railroads. And you know what we call those people?

    Male Guest: Communists!

    Female Guest: Anarchists!

    Herman Mankiewicz: No, our Quixote, he's a two-fisted muckraker. In fact, someone predicts that he will one day win the presidency and bring about, get this...

    [laughing uncontrollably]

    Herman Mankiewicz: ... a socialist revolution!

    Louis B. Mayer: What a bunch of bullshit.

    Herman Mankiewicz: Is it? Tell him, Willie. Tell him.

    [Silence]

    Herman Mankiewicz: Upton Sinclair used exactly those words to describe a young William Randolph Hearst.

    Louis B. Mayer: [leaping from his seat] You miserable bastard!

    Herman Mankiewicz: [bowing] How do you do?

    [Some guests begin to leave the room, but Hearst's and Mayer's eyes stay on Mank]

    Herman Mankiewicz: Our Quixote, he hungers, he thirsts, he lusts for the voters to love him, love him enough to make him president, but they won't. And they don't. How do you suppose that could happen? Could it be because, in their hearts, they know he values power over people?

    [More guests leave as Mank approaches Hearst, still seated]

    Herman Mankiewicz: Disillusioned in Congress, he authors not one single piece of legislation in two terms. Can you believe that? That'll take some writing. Placed in nomination for president... it's too radical for the boys in the back, his bid goes nowhere! But we're doing something. We're building sympathy!

    [Even more guests leave]

    Herman Mankiewicz: Rejected, he flees to lotus land, where his faithful troll, Sancho, has prepared a mythical kingdom for...

    [Mank eyes Davies, stopping himself totally]

    Herman Mankiewicz: Wait a minute. I forgot the love interest! Her name: Dulcinea.

    [Every remaining head in the room turns to Davies]

    Herman Mankiewicz: Funny, adventurous, smarter than she acts. Ah, she's a... she's a showgirl! Beneath his social stratum, but that's okay because true love on the big screens, we all know is blind. And she... well, she loves him, too. So he takes her away to his m-mythical kingdom,

    [to butler]

    Herman Mankiewicz: can I get a bicarb?

    [back to the guests]

    Herman Mankiewicz: Now, along comes nemesis, that's Greek for any guy in a black hat, nemesis runs for governor, and he's a shoo-in to win. Why?

    [points to Hearst]

    Herman Mankiewicz: Because he's EXACTLY what our Don used to be! An idealist, ya get it? And not only that, nemesis is the same guy who once predicted that our Quixote would one day preside over a socialist revolution. Our Quixote looks into the mirror of his youth and decides to break this glass, a maddening reminder of who he once was. Assisted by his faithful Sancho

    [pointing to Mayer]

    Herman Mankiewicz: and armed w-with all the black magic at his command, he does just this. Destroying, in the process, not one man... but two.

    [Hearst is clearly furious, but maintains his composure]

    Herman Mankiewicz: Well, what do ya think, Louis? Hm? Do ya think it'll play?

    [Mank finally belches onto the floor. Any guest who hasn't already left does so]

    Herman Mankiewicz: Don't worry, folks. The white wine came up with the fish!

  • Herman Mankiewicz: Irving, you are a literate man. You know the difference between communism and socialism. In socialism, everyone shares the wealth. In communism, everyone shares the poverty.