About affirmative action

Devonte 2022-04-16 09:01:09

Academia can be said to be a concentration camp for leftist liberals in the United States. In the past year and a half of my PhD, I have been swept away by liberal ideas from beginning to end.

Just write a few bullet points, and fill it up when you are interested:

Equal rights naturally equal obligations

In itself undoubtedly represents the meaning of progress, feminism and BLM do not represent the rejection of difference, the recognition of difference is the basis for equality

I think opposing presuppositions and judging individuals as different from presuppositions is the most essential and valuable part of affirmative action. True equality is a development that benefits all genders and races. Take the discussion in Parenting class as an example: One view is that it is not gender inequality, but a more economical and efficient family division of labor, because in most cases men can make money more efficiently and conveniently. The professor first objected: In most cases, the fact that men can make money more efficiently itself reflects gender discrimination in educational resources and occupational treatment; but even if we do not talk about this, the gender division of labor in family upbringing can completely obey the principle of economics, if In a family, the husband is more able to make money and the wife is good at housekeeping, so there is no problem with the male and the female. But the question is: what if the wife in a family is more profitable and the husband is better at housekeeping? In this case, obeying the principle of economics requires facing enormous social pressure, a large part of which includes the ability and effort of the housekeeping husband. belittle. In this sense, men themselves are victims of this gender inequality, deprived of their right to run their homes and given exorbitant expectations of household economic responsibility.

But sometimes the radicals go too far and go too far, mentioning that any difference represents discrimination, and even equate eliminating differences with promoting equality; utilitarian interpretation of all differences: if any indicator favors the traditional strong side, it will be rejected. Attributing to discrimination and inequality, while completely ignoring or even denying the element of difference itself. Although the logic of opening the door before opening the window may be progressive, it is essentially an extremist way of thinking where the butt determines the head... Imagine how often feminists would cite this if research found that men live longer on average than women argument...

Too many liberals are self-improving and have no room for conservative voices. Take the feminists in the play as an example. Their methods of smearing the opposition are no different from those of fascists, and their essence is self-promotion and intolerance to opposition. This has been particularly evident in the United States over the past four years: you can think of globalization as a general trend, liberalism as a beacon of humanity, but Trump's 70 million supporters are also human, so-called "Privileged" who are squeezed by the global division of labor and affirmative action. ones". Yet in the eyes of the left, in the eyes of my professors, talk show hosts, Hollywood stars, Silicon Valley tech giants, they are just ignorant, backward, uneducated idiots rather than their equals. It's ironic enough that liberals with higher education, decent jobs, and a good life hold high the banner of liberty and equality, but see the workers of the rust belt and the farmers of the middle as hogs. Imagine if 15% of the country's population was white or black and they marched on the streets all day to demand affirmative action, the media reported that politicians praised, and I am a Chinese with a low salary or even an unemployment, I would absolutely hate the frequent affirmative movement ...

The nitpicking of radical liberals and their dogmatism in every detail in the name of inclusion. My boss emphasizes over and over again that it is humanpower instead of manpower... Then I'm surprised, why don't you just change human to huwoman? Why does it even matter?

Sometimes it feels like the political spectrum itself is a continuous closed loop. The development of equality on the left to the extreme is almost indistinguishable from the despotism of the extreme right... After political correctness has developed to a certain point, it cannot hold a single needle; but sometimes this seems to be necessary to bring about change. In such a large system, Step by step may only stay where you are forever, and if you don't cry out, overdo it, and you won't even take that small step.

Intermingling, colliding, and self-dissolving within American society is an interesting history lesson.

View more about Mrs. America reviews