The history books I read when I was in school talked about World War II. They were often narrated from the perspective of the anti-fascist battlefield. Of course, I wouldn’t think about it. Conflicts are often caused by the fact that both parties simply cannot understand the other's position. Some marketing accounts are always talking about the low-level mistakes made by the Third Reich in the war, but history has always chosen this one and only result among millions of choices. Existence is reasonable, and the Third Reich is doomed to fail, because the premise of the Germanic nation's conquest of all other races is that the Germanic chariots must continue to win, and continue to bow down to hostile forces at home and abroad. This endless cycle that cannot be stopped is like Like the unrealizable perpetual motion machine, once it is turned on, it will definitely stop at some point. In the European battlefield of World War II, there are some things that are difficult to understand from the perspective of the East. For example, Switzerland, which is in the center of Western Europe, could avoid being occupied by declaring itself as a neutral country. Just imagine that this kind of thing is impossible in East Asia. Either it will not be occupied, or it will be occupied in one piece, and there will not be a vacant area in the occupied area, just like there are two countries within a country in Italy, indicating that the social foundation of Europe is still based on a kind of on the basis of the contract. The independence between the various European nations is too strong, which means that it is basically impossible for Nazi Germany to integrate Western Europe into a country, and this integration must be based on the Germanic as the center. , In East Asia, if Japan can progress step by step, it is really possible to realize the so-called "Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere". Japan's surrender was the least thorough among the Axis powers, neither occupying nor abolishing the imperial system, while Emperor Hirohito In the surrender letter, it is still about lifelong gratitude. The only protagonist of World War II is the United States. If there is no such superpower to join, the Third Reich and Japan still have a certain chance of winning. At least there is a unified Western Europe or East Asia. Possibility, but the involvement of the United States makes both countries appear vulnerable. Even if Yamamoto Fifty-Six completely wiped out the U.S. military in Hawaii, the United States will still have several Hawaiian counterattacks, and hitting the stone with the egg is nothing more than a bargaining chip, not the possibility of winning. Just like Marshal Jin's goal is by no means the south, but the United States to ensure the existence of this regime in the true sense, but no matter how human history is deduced at that time, and how many experts participate, the final result is reasonable, and it is difficult to appear. Miracle. In essence, there are only two countries in the Axis powers. As for Italy, it’s a total drag. It can’t even conquer Africa. What can it use to conquer Europe, the powers, and the only two countries at both ends of the entire Eurasian continent are basically lacking. common value system , so the power of the Axis powers is really too weak, and Hitler's blitzkrieg is really helpless. An overly narrow ethnic policy makes it difficult to fundamentally control the occupied areas. Although it is only aimed at the genocide of the Jews, why should other ethnic groups follow the Germans as the best ethnic group? They can only rely on strong military power, but Britain and France have been for hundreds of years. The accumulation of the third empire cannot establish the advantage of the dimension level. Even if the V1 and V2 missiles are developed in the later stage, the overall strength is difficult to challenge the traditional military power, otherwise it will not even be deciphered by the British. I don't know yet. It's a long process for Lu Quan to replace Hai Quan. It's not something that the Nazis can catch up with in the past ten years. It's not possible to overtake Britain and the United States overnight. Refreshed. The national character of Europe as a whole can only form a unified power in the age of cold weapons. After the industrialization and high capitalization, it has been difficult to generate a superpower that can check and balance all European nations, and Japan cannot completely occupy China, because of China's size and size. The population is several times that of Japan, and it is difficult for Japan to completely occupy such a large country at the national level, so Japan still only occupied the central and eastern regions of China in its heyday. In essence, it is because the country that started the war is too small compared to the aggressor country, and Tokyo cannot be moved to China. Therefore, there is basically no US and Soviet intervention in the later period, and Japan cannot completely occupy China, but the time for that kind of war of resistance will be longer. long. On the other hand, the European battlefield in the late World War II was still a division of power and interests. Even if the Allies represented justice, that was the justice of the traditional Western forces, while the Soviet Union in the East needed the victory of the war to realize its strategic interests. Seeing the US-Soviet hegemony after the war, it was precisely because of the nuclear weapons, the ultimate killer, that the two forces did not dare to go to war in an all-round way. Imagine a world without the ultimate killer. Would there still be a super empire and It is unknown that traditional forces are killing each other. Therefore, war cannot be just simple justice and simple evil, but a big shuffle of redistribution of various forces, and there is no absolute good and evil on both sides of the war. Did Hitler mean to the entire human history, Is there no positive meaning at all? After years of accumulation, the Third Reich cannot establish the advantage of dimension level. Even if V1 and V2 missiles are developed in the later stage, the overall strength is difficult to challenge the traditional military power, otherwise it will not even be able to decipher its own secret code by the United Kingdom. I don't know yet, the replacement of sea power by Lu Quan is a long process. It is not something that the Nazis can catch up with in the past ten years or so, and the steelmaking of steel can't surpass Britain and catch up with the United States overnight. Injured. The national character of Europe as a whole can only form a unified great power in the age of cold weapons. After the industrialization and high capitalism, it has been difficult to produce a superpower that can balance all European nations. Japan cannot completely occupy China, because of the size and size of China. The population is several times that of Japan, and it is difficult for Japan to completely occupy such a large country at the national level, so Japan still only occupied the central and eastern regions of China in its heyday. In essence, it is because the country that started the war is too small compared to the aggressor country, and Tokyo cannot be moved to China. Therefore, there is basically no US and Soviet intervention in the later period, and Japan cannot completely occupy China, but the time for that kind of war of resistance will be longer. long. On the other hand, the European battlefield in the late World War II was still a division of power and interests. Even if the Allies represented justice, that was the justice of the traditional Western forces, while the Soviet Union in the East needed the victory of the war to realize its strategic interests. Seeing the US-Soviet hegemony after the war, it was precisely because of the nuclear weapons, the ultimate killer, that the two forces did not dare to go to war in an all-round way. Imagine a world without the ultimate killer. Would there still be a super empire and It is unknown that traditional forces are killing each other. Therefore, war cannot be just simple justice and simple evil, but a big shuffle of redistribution of various forces, and there is no absolute good and evil on both sides of the war. Did Hitler mean to the entire human history, Is there no positive meaning at all? After years of accumulation, the Third Reich cannot establish the advantage of dimension level. Even if V1 and V2 missiles are developed in the later stage, the overall strength is difficult to challenge the traditional military power, otherwise it will not even be able to decipher its own secret code by the United Kingdom. I don't know yet, the replacement of sea power by Lu Quan is a long process. It is not something that the Nazis can catch up with in the past ten years or so, and the steelmaking of steel can't surpass Britain and catch up with the United States overnight. Injured. The national character of Europe as a whole can only form a unified power in the age of cold weapons. After the industrialization and high capitalization, it has been difficult to generate a superpower that can check and balance all European nations, and Japan cannot completely occupy China, because of China's size and size. The population is several times that of Japan, and it is difficult for Japan to completely occupy such a large country at the national level, so Japan still only occupied the central and eastern regions of China in its heyday. In essence, it is because the country that started the war is too small compared to the aggressor country, and Tokyo cannot be moved to China. Therefore, there is basically no US and Soviet intervention in the later period, and Japan cannot completely occupy China, but the time for that kind of war of resistance will be longer. long. On the other hand, the European battlefield in the late World War II was still a division of power and interests. Even if the Allies represented justice, that was the justice of the traditional Western forces, while the Soviet Union in the East needed the victory of the war to realize its strategic interests. Seeing the US-Soviet hegemony after the war, it was precisely because of the nuclear weapons, the ultimate killer, that the two forces did not dare to go to war in an all-round way. Imagine a world without the ultimate killer. Would there still be a super empire and It is unknown that traditional forces are killing each other. Therefore, war cannot be just simple justice and simple evil, but a big shuffle of redistribution of various forces, and there is no absolute good and evil on both sides of the war. Did Hitler mean to the entire human history, Is there no positive meaning at all? In its heyday, it still only occupied the central and eastern regions of China. In essence, it is because the country that started the war is too small compared to the aggressor country, and Tokyo cannot be moved to China. Therefore, there is basically no US and Soviet intervention in the later period, and Japan cannot completely occupy China, but the time for that kind of war of resistance will be longer. long. On the other hand, the European battlefield in the late World War II was still a division of power and interests. Even if the Allies represented justice, that was the justice of the traditional Western forces, while the Soviet Union in the East needed the victory of the war to realize its strategic interests. Seeing the US-Soviet hegemony after the war, it was precisely because of the nuclear weapons, the ultimate killer, that the two forces did not dare to go to war in an all-round way. Imagine a world without the ultimate killer. Would there still be a super empire and It is unknown that traditional forces are killing each other. Therefore, war cannot be just simple justice and simple evil, but a big shuffle of redistribution of various forces, and there is no absolute good and evil on both sides of the war. Did Hitler mean to the entire human history, Is there no positive meaning at all? In its heyday, it still only occupied the central and eastern regions of China. In essence, it is because the country that started the war is too small compared to the aggressor country, and Tokyo cannot be moved to China. Therefore, there is basically no US and Soviet intervention in the later period, and Japan cannot completely occupy China, but the time for that kind of war of resistance will be longer. long. On the other hand, the European battlefield in the late World War II was still a division of power and interests. Even if the Allies represented justice, that was the justice of the traditional Western forces, while the Soviet Union in the East needed the victory of the war to realize its strategic interests. Seeing the US-Soviet hegemony after the war, it was precisely because of the nuclear weapons, the ultimate killer, that the two forces did not dare to go to war in an all-round way. Imagine a world without the ultimate killer. Would there still be a super empire and It is unknown that traditional forces are killing each other. Therefore, war cannot be just simple justice and simple evil, but a big shuffle of redistribution of various forces, and there is no absolute good and evil on both sides of the war. Did Hitler mean to the entire human history, Is there no positive meaning at all?
View more about Apocalypse: The Second World War reviews
