historical controversy

Jovanny 2022-03-22 09:02:11

There is still a lot of controversy surrounding this film. The issue of intellectual property may not wait until brain-computer interfaces become commonplace. Put a dash cam on your brain. This problem can be fundamentally solved in the future.

Of course Gary Oldman can do everything. Just after winning the award, the wrist must be big. I don't know if I can follow the director's instructions. The David Fincher family has fought for this matter, and now they are all gone with the wind, meaningless. The movie feels more like a black-and-white version of Once Upon a Time in Hollywood, which restores many scenes from the black-and-white period. MGM got dark at night.

These scenes are very imagery and are very beautiful in black and white. Give a recommendation. Although it can't be compared with "Citizen Kane", as a spin-off movie, it's okay. Recommend the "Mank" program of "Villain Film Review".

View more about Mank reviews

Extended Reading
  • Rhett 2022-01-03 08:01:40

    The problem with the script is not small. Compared with the intertwined narratives of "Citizen Kane" and "Social Network", it seems too fragmented to achieve the effect that this structure should be able to bring. Too many characters are involved, and the skill to write group dramas is not good, which leads to a lot of waste pen and makes people incomprehensible. The function of the scene is single and blunt, and I can't wait to tell the audience directly what I want to express in this scene. In addition, Vinci’s black-and-white feature film debut is also a bit surprising. The main light is not frontal light most of the time, and the background is often deliberately set with a bright and blind light source. It is rare for black-and-white films to use this lighting scheme. Vinci did not reproduce the previous level of scheduling in this work, and was even dragged down by the script to the level of dry show.

  • Garnet 2022-03-25 09:01:12

    The most prominent feature is that David Fincher's ability to do old is too strong. The first shot shows the texture of the films of the 1930s, and the three-dimensional watermark subtitles reflect the film industry capabilities of the new century. Manca should have at least a few Oscars for technical awards, including nominations and even wins for photography. At first glance, I thought it was a tribute to the fan film like Long Live Caesar of the Coen Brothers, but it is not so simple. David Fincher's version of Once Upon a Time in Hollywood. He cut into the panorama from the perspective of Mankeski to show Hollywood in the 1930s, and in addition to world politics, he also tapped into Mankesky's heart. A heart of arrogance. Mankeisky, if it doesn't make it, is Don in Billy Wilder's 'The Lost Weekend'. There are also many backgrounds and fandoms in Mankay. The raw meat is a bit hard to chew and needs two brushes. Two hours is not too long. And the script structure also pays homage to Citizen Kane, with flashbacks and flashbacks, just more frequent flashbacks, but unfortunately no rosebud runs through the whole play.

Mank quotes

  • [a drunken Herman Mankiewicz sits at the corner of a large dinner table at an elaborate costume party, hosted by William Randolph Hearst and Louis B. Mayer. Instead of tinking on a glass to get the guests' attention, he slashes his glass with a knife. Gasps fill the room as he rises from his seat]

    Herman Mankiewicz: I've got a great idea for a picture, Louis. A picture I just know you're gonna love. It's a modern day version of Quixote!

    [Mank realizes his voice echoes through the room, but he continues, circling the table full of silent guests]

    Herman Mankiewicz: Now I know none of you read, but you know what it's about. A deluded old nobleman, who tilts at windmills. So how might we update this story?

    Butler: [whispers to Hearst] Do you want me to get someone?

    William Randolph Hearst: No.

    Herman Mankiewicz: How about we make our Quixote... a newspaperman? Who else could make a living tilting at windmills? But that's not enough... no, he wants more than readership. He wants more than adulation, he wants love. So, he runs for public office, and because he's notably rich, he wins... no, w-w-w-wait a minute. Notably rich and powerful, can't win over an audience unless notably rich and powerful sees the error of his ways in the final reel. Notably rich and powerful and making no goddamn excuses for it is only admirable in real life. Isn't that right, Louis?

    [Mayer glares at Mank as he drunkenly attempts to light his cigarette with the massive fireplace at the end of the room, unsuccessfully. Marion Davies takes a swig of her drink]

    Herman Mankiewicz: So what do we do? Anybody? We give him ideals! Ideals that any dirt-poor, depression-weary audience can identify with. Our Quixote is against crooked trusts, he's for the eight-hour workday, fair income tax, better schools. Why, he's even for government ownership of railroads. And you know what we call those people?

    Male Guest: Communists!

    Female Guest: Anarchists!

    Herman Mankiewicz: No, our Quixote, he's a two-fisted muckraker. In fact, someone predicts that he will one day win the presidency and bring about, get this...

    [laughing uncontrollably]

    Herman Mankiewicz: ... a socialist revolution!

    Louis B. Mayer: What a bunch of bullshit.

    Herman Mankiewicz: Is it? Tell him, Willie. Tell him.

    [Silence]

    Herman Mankiewicz: Upton Sinclair used exactly those words to describe a young William Randolph Hearst.

    Louis B. Mayer: [leaping from his seat] You miserable bastard!

    Herman Mankiewicz: [bowing] How do you do?

    [Some guests begin to leave the room, but Hearst's and Mayer's eyes stay on Mank]

    Herman Mankiewicz: Our Quixote, he hungers, he thirsts, he lusts for the voters to love him, love him enough to make him president, but they won't. And they don't. How do you suppose that could happen? Could it be because, in their hearts, they know he values power over people?

    [More guests leave as Mank approaches Hearst, still seated]

    Herman Mankiewicz: Disillusioned in Congress, he authors not one single piece of legislation in two terms. Can you believe that? That'll take some writing. Placed in nomination for president... it's too radical for the boys in the back, his bid goes nowhere! But we're doing something. We're building sympathy!

    [Even more guests leave]

    Herman Mankiewicz: Rejected, he flees to lotus land, where his faithful troll, Sancho, has prepared a mythical kingdom for...

    [Mank eyes Davies, stopping himself totally]

    Herman Mankiewicz: Wait a minute. I forgot the love interest! Her name: Dulcinea.

    [Every remaining head in the room turns to Davies]

    Herman Mankiewicz: Funny, adventurous, smarter than she acts. Ah, she's a... she's a showgirl! Beneath his social stratum, but that's okay because true love on the big screens, we all know is blind. And she... well, she loves him, too. So he takes her away to his m-mythical kingdom,

    [to butler]

    Herman Mankiewicz: can I get a bicarb?

    [back to the guests]

    Herman Mankiewicz: Now, along comes nemesis, that's Greek for any guy in a black hat, nemesis runs for governor, and he's a shoo-in to win. Why?

    [points to Hearst]

    Herman Mankiewicz: Because he's EXACTLY what our Don used to be! An idealist, ya get it? And not only that, nemesis is the same guy who once predicted that our Quixote would one day preside over a socialist revolution. Our Quixote looks into the mirror of his youth and decides to break this glass, a maddening reminder of who he once was. Assisted by his faithful Sancho

    [pointing to Mayer]

    Herman Mankiewicz: and armed w-with all the black magic at his command, he does just this. Destroying, in the process, not one man... but two.

    [Hearst is clearly furious, but maintains his composure]

    Herman Mankiewicz: Well, what do ya think, Louis? Hm? Do ya think it'll play?

    [Mank finally belches onto the floor. Any guest who hasn't already left does so]

    Herman Mankiewicz: Don't worry, folks. The white wine came up with the fish!

  • Herman Mankiewicz: Irving, you are a literate man. You know the difference between communism and socialism. In socialism, everyone shares the wealth. In communism, everyone shares the poverty.